Asked in Personal Injury for Alabama

Q: What is comparative negligence?

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers
Mr. Joshua Benjamin Key
Mr. Joshua Benjamin Key
Answered
  • Birmingham, AL
  • Licensed in Alabama

A: Comparative negligence is a rule of law applied in accident cases that assigns responsibility and damages based on the negligence of every party directly involved in the accident. Comparative negligence can reduce the award of damages to the plaintiff in proportion to his/her fault. Comparative negligence is a standard that has been adopted in some states, however, some states still use contributory negligence which denies recovery to any party whose negligence has added to the cause of the accident in any way. Contributory negligence can lead to harsh results for the slightly negligent plaintiff in some cases, and therefore, has led some states to adopt comparative negligence in order to avoid barring the plaintiff from any recovery at all.

Alabama is a state that uses the "pure contributory negligence" statute. This means that in Alabama, if you are found to be in any way at fault for your accident, you cannot collect compensation for your injury.

Drew Barnett
Drew Barnett
Answered
  • Birmingham, AL
  • Licensed in Alabama

A: Contributory negligence is a defense to negligence actions that essentially states that the plaintiff's own conduct caused, or at least contributed, to his or her injury. Jurisdictions across the U.S. follow one of three different schemes regarding contributory negligence: pure comparative negligence, partial comparative negligence, and pure contributory negligence. In pure comparative negligence jurisdictions, the apportionment of damages tracks apportionment of fault perfectly--if a defendant is 25% responsible and a plaintiff is 75% responsible, the plaintiff will recover 25% of his total damages. In partial comparative negligence jurisdictions, damages are apportioned only if the defendant's fault exceeds the plaintiff's fault. Thus, the plaintiff will not recover any damages in a partial comparative negligence jurisdiction if he is found responsible for 50% or more of his own damages. In pure contributory negligence jurisdictions, like Alabama, a plaintiff cannot recover any damages if he is found responsible for ANY of his damages. Depending on the facts of a particular case, there may be ways to combat a defense of pure contributory negligence. Thus, you should seek the advice of a local personal injury attorney regarding the specific details of your case.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.