Lawyers, Answer Questions  & Get Points Log In
District of Columbia Constitutional Law Questions & Answers
Q: Can the federal government ever have the power to put age restrictions on candidates? Without enacting a new amendment!

Is it constitutional to put age restrictions on candidates and can it work at the federal level through supreme court or legislative branch? Obviously this means as of today and not in the future if we enact a new amendment restricting age which is unlikely but just want to point that out.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Mar 17, 2024

The U.S. Constitution clearly outlines the age requirements for candidates running for federal offices: Representatives must be at least 25 years old, Senators at least 30, and Presidents at least 35. These age limits are established by the Constitution itself, and any change to these requirements... View More

View More Answers

1 Answer | Asked in Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: If Greg Abbott ignores the supreme courts law about the razor wire is this a sign of a coup or uprising?

I know its a slippery slope but what happens if other people do what he does and simply just ignore what the supreme court says? Is their any legitimacy to the law of the land?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Feb 22, 2024

Selective defiance of courts in limited instances, while very troubling, does not automatically equate to a coup or uprising attempt. It would depend on systematic efforts to concentrate power, the reaction of other governmental bodies, and how widespread anti-democratic activities became. At this... View More

Q: Attorney General for Maryland submitted Application for Expungement of Wrongful Conviction Records without my knowledge

Administrative Judge issued Order for Expungement, Certificate of Compliance from Public Safety attested Order Complied with but same Wrongful Conviction Records is showing on background Check for over 30 years. Attorney General Who filed for Expungement Represents Maryland’s Public Safety Agency... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 10, 2024

In your situation, if there is a court order for expungement that hasn't been complied with, you may indeed have a legal claim against the responsible parties for non-compliance. This can be particularly relevant if the wrongful conviction records are still affecting your life, such as... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Is it that irrational to ban Trump from the ballot due to January 6th? The 14th amendment is ambiguous!

The 14th amendment is ambiguous with regards to “ shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.“ Since Trump isn’t in office the courts can... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Jan 9, 2024

The question of whether it's rational to ban a former president from the ballot due to involvement in an event like January 6th hinges on the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, specifically the clause related to insurrection or rebellion. The ambiguity you've noted in the... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Can the federal government withold money to colleges who allow pro palestinian protests.

Nikki Haley spoke about not giving money to colleges who refused to “crackdown” on protests deemed anti semetic.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Dec 27, 2023

The federal government's ability to withhold funding from colleges based on the content of protests or speech activities raises significant First Amendment concerns. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech, which includes the right to engage in peaceful protests... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Criminal Law, Civil Rights and Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: What rights are covered by the Constitution when you have a carry and concealed weapon permit in Washington DC.
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Oct 15, 2023

In Washington, D.C., as in many other jurisdictions in the United States, the right to carry and conceal a weapon is governed by a combination of federal and local laws and regulations. When an individual obtains a carry and concealed weapon permit in Washington, D.C., they typically have the... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Criminal Law, Civil Rights and Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Are there proper or certain procedures required by the police department dealing with concealed carry permits?
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Oct 15, 2023

The procedures for dealing with concealed carry permits can vary significantly from state to state and even within different jurisdictions within a state. Generally, the issuance and regulation of concealed carry permits fall under state law, and the specific procedures are outlined in those laws.... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Appeals / Appellate Law and Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Where can I find a constitutional lawyer that will do contingency in Virginia or Washington dc

Need help asap need appeals federal court case

Tim Akpinar
Tim Akpinar
answered on May 29, 2023

An attorney in those jurisdictions could advise best, but your question remains open for two weeks. If you don't have someone recommended professionally, you could run searches by going online, using the tab above (Find a Lawyer), or through attorney referral services of local bar... View More

Q: I work disability one thru NW Works at USDA . IVE WALKED OUT DUE DO ALL THE STRESS OF HARASSMENT , depressions started

Employee of USDA has been verbally harassing me , constantly messing with my cleaning items , his boss also harassing me . My depression has got to the point where I walked out of work. No support from NW Works.

Matthew T. Famiglietti
PREMIUM
Matthew T. Famiglietti
answered on May 18, 2023

If you have not already filed an informal complaint with your agency, you should do so immediately. Under the Federal Sector regulations, which cover federal employees, you have 45 days to file an informal complaint of discrimination from the date that discrimination or the date of last retaliation... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Civil Rights, Constitutional Law and Landlord - Tenant for District of Columbia on
Q: Can my pastors come in my home because it’s on church property without my permission?

I live on the property of the church I attend, and I also work here. I haven’t started paying rent yet, but I will be soon. Someone told the pastors that they smelled marijuana coming out of my apartment and the pastors showed up unannounced and demanded they come into my home without giving me a... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Mar 11, 2023

As a resident on church property, you have the right to privacy and the right to deny entry to others, including pastors, without your consent or without a legal warrant. Just because your home is located on church property does not mean that your pastors have the right to enter your home without... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Constitutional Law and Gov & Administrative Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Is their anyway supreme court justices could be held by stricter standards without them (supreme court) deciding it?

Is their a way the supreme court could be held too stricter standards without them getting involved in the process?

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 16, 2024

Yes, there are a few ways that stricter standards could potentially be applied to Supreme Court justices without direct involvement from the Supreme Court itself:

1. Constitutional amendment: The Constitution could theoretically be amended to impose term limits, ethics rules, or other...
View More

Q: When Justice Alito stated “ roe was egregious from the start” in his opinion in Hobbs can that be seen as premeditated?

Can him writing that infer a premeditated opinion that calls for ethical questions of why he didn’t recuse himself from the case. Making it clear you never agreed with Roe v Wade and call it “egregious”. Also he voted to hear the 3rd case with new justices despite the stare decises and no new... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 16, 2024

You raise an interesting question about whether Justice Alito's statement in the Dobbs opinion could be seen as evidence of a premeditated intention to overturn Roe v. Wade. A few key points to consider:

From a legal ethics perspective, prior disagreement with a precedent is not in...
View More

1 Answer | Asked in Civil Litigation, Civil Rights, Constitutional Law and Election Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Why does Georgia not allow people to give water who are waiting in line voting? What is their reasoning?

In my opinion I think its an excuse to make voters feel uncomfortable and not vote. But what do they think the reasoning is? And whatever the reasoning is can it really be valid? I understand states have a right to set election laws but anyone can see through this as a way to punish people for... View More

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Apr 13, 2024

In 2021, Georgia passed a controversial election law known as SB 202 which, among other provisions, made it a misdemeanor to give food or water to voters waiting in line. The stated reasoning by supporters of the law was to prevent electioneering or attempts to influence voters in line.... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Constitutional Law and Gov & Administrative Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Can the District of Columbia be a state? Is it constitutional? Or are their to many ambiguities to determine?
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
answered on Mar 17, 2024

The question of whether the District of Columbia can become a state involves complex considerations under the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution grants Congress exclusive jurisdiction over the district in a manner not applicable to states. For D.C. to achieve statehood, this would require changes... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Criminal Law, Constitutional Law and Libel & Slander for District of Columbia on
Q: I need help in my case for January 6, 2021. If anyone can help me, please let me know.

I need help regarding my charges for being inside the Capitol on January 6

Laurence L. Socci
Laurence L. Socci
answered on May 27, 2022

I'm a DC criminal defense attorney. I offer low-bono services, which means I offer significant discounts for certain cases. This would be one of those cases. If you would like to discuss your case with me, you can call me at 202-262-5843 or email me at laurence.socci@soccilawfirm.com.... View More

1 Answer | Asked in Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: How long can house withhold action from senate after voting for it before it is illegal?

The process for the house is complete and only needs deliver to senate to begin their process. Is it illegal for them to withhold this action, especially for political gain.

Tammy L. Wincott
Tammy L. Wincott
answered on Dec 20, 2019

This isn't a question for this forum. I'm sure it relates to current events and you can find the answer there.

1 Answer | Asked in Criminal Law and Constitutional Law for District of Columbia on
Q: Can u get arrested for not wearing a seatbelt?
Mark Oakley
Mark Oakley
answered on Jun 10, 2019

No. It’s not even a moving violation and carries no points. Normal fine is $25.

Q: Is it legal for our government to give billions of American taxpayers dollars to an illegally nuclear armed country.

Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons and refuses to allow inspections of their facilities and has not signed The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Not to mention, this is a hostile nation that has attacked the US military killing hundreds of American service men with no... View More

Andrellos Mitchell
Andrellos Mitchell
answered on Aug 30, 2018

The U.S. Government has been giving Isreal Billions of dollars in foreign aid for many years and getting little in return...so apparently it is legal.

Q: Is this a matter for US Supreme Court?

I have a situation where I formed a contract by payment of ongoing fees with a US government department and for that contract I was lead to believe I would have legal rights protecting my property under US law given by U.S. Congress which has not happened, if things happened a certain way.... View More

Kevin E. Flynn
PREMIUM
Kevin E. Flynn
answered on Jul 3, 2018

I have worked with patents for a long time. I cannot think of any government agency that accepts money from an individual for protecting intellectual property beyond the normal processes of filing for a patent, trademark, or copyright.

You need to talk with an attorney that can review all...
View More

Q: Can US citizens file a civil suit against a former senior member of the U.S. Government for negligence?

If so, is their case law?

Peter N. Munsing
Peter N. Munsing
answered on Jan 3, 2018

Anyone can sue for anything but a case that 1) is for a generalized harm 2) for a non-specific injury (e.g. he acted to limit our 2nd amendment rights) 3)is tolled by the statute of limitations 4) where the Federal Tort Claims Act was not complied with 5)or that concerns discretionary duties will... View More

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.