It is a case that focuses on the 2nd amendment. (I just need to know who won that case)
answered on Feb 1, 2017
See: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html
The best first step is an Initial Consultation with an Attorney. You can read more about me, my credentials, awards, honors, testimonials, and media appearances/ publications on my law practice website. I practice law in CA, NY, MA,... View More
People say that this doesn't mean anything but is it the current law or not? I'm finding alot of opposing ideas on it. Is it illegal or not? (1) Whoever knowingly mutilates, defaces, physically defiles, burns, maintains on the floor or ground, or tramples upon any flag of the United... View More
answered on Dec 7, 2016
There are indeed legal precedents which hold that the right to free speech permits political acts such as flag burning. However be prepared to defend the fact that such an act was indeed political speech and not otherwise endangering the public's safety. It can get tricky, especially depending... View More
answered on Oct 20, 2015
I do not understand the question, perhaps because you are asking the wrong question or worded it wrong. Who is the they?
answered on Oct 14, 2015
Apparently not, but the word person is very important and the constitution, depending upon the facts, can apply.
answered on Oct 10, 2015
You gave no facts. Without facts we cannot give an opinion. This is much more than a basic legal question, but requires much time in order to answer.
answered on Oct 10, 2015
What are the facts here? Without facts it is hard to apply the law.
answered on Oct 8, 2015
Facts are needed here. I do not know what you are asking. It appears to be whether there is an addition for compensation, and you have not shown any facts at all, just a question. We at least need to know some facts in order to form an opinion.
I see from the Opinion of J. Sullivan of July 14, 2014, that the Priviliges and Immunities question was left open. I am wondering whether or not the parties pursued this question, as this portion of the motion to dismiss was denied. In particular, the court left the question as to whether... View More
answered on Oct 1, 2015
If you want specific advice, you normally have to pay for that. This is not a basic legal question, it calls for an attorney to spend time on research.
answered on Sep 28, 2015
The Supreme court makes law all the time. It interprets the constitutions of the various states and makes laws concerning that.
answered on Apr 5, 2011
There are two sites that people use to find the Court's docket or recent opinions. http://www.scotusblog.com/ and www.oyez.com
answered on Jan 14, 2011
The specific policy would depend on the jail, detention center, or prison where the inmate is being housed. As a general rule in the US, a prisoner may file an official grievance with the agency designated by federal or local law. The inmate is required to be made aware of these procedures. The... View More
answered on Dec 21, 2010
Article 1 Section 10 contains what is called the "Obligation of Contracts" clause which prohibits the government from making laws that that can impair the validity of existing contracts. This applies to legal contracts and the government can make the subject matter of the contract... View More
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.