There is no limit on what doctors may or may not put in your records.

Some faculties/medical groups have procedures to addresses issues in patients' medical records.

In some states, there are methods in which you can seek a medial record change, or an addition to your medical records.

Yes this is a potential case. Malpractice is where the doctor acts against the standard of care. Another doctor would have to review and give that analysis. The extent of your harm may determine the viability of the case.

A West Virginia attorney could advise best, but your question remains open for two weeks. This is actually something that your own attorney(s), if you have them for the malpractice, disability, and bankruptcy actions, should answer, as it could go to the issue of their approach and strategy. This... View More

From what you state it is not clear there was malpractice. Malpractice means the doctor did something, or failed to do something, that any reasonable doctor would have done/not done. This must be evaluated by another doctor.

Consult with experienced attorneys in your state.

This is something a West Virginia should advise on, but your post remains open for three weeks. You're asking about pain and suffering. But based on your description, it's difficult to identify a strong basis for a suit. If you're contemplating damages related to the roughly one-day... View More

It depends on whether you could demonstrate that the doctor breached a duty of medical care owed to you. That would be a determination that could be made by a review of your medical records. This is something to discuss with a West Virginia attorney, but your post remains open for a week. You could... View More

No. None of those errors, individually or collectively, is enough to justify a summary judgement. In West Virginia, the law favors the resolution of legal disputes on the merits, not on technicalities.

This is something you should be discussing with your attorney.

I do not believe that you can sue Sedgewick for anything. Your remedy was to appeal the decision in your Workers' Compensation claim. If you did not have an attorney in your Workers' Comp claim, you should have. He could have obtained a report from your doctor, and cross-examined the... View More

If we assume (and it's a big assumption) that the doctor fell below the accepted standard of care when he took you off your medication, a jury where I practice would not award you enough to make your case worth the time and expense it would take to pursue it. Medical malpractice cases are... View More

If you are the person who asked a similar question yesterday, the answer I gave to that question still largely applies. Whether you have a case or not is more of a medical issue than a legal issue at this point. If it was a nurse whom you believe was negligent, then your attorney must hire a nurse... View More

To successfully recover from a doctor, you must prove that the doctor was negligent. In other words, the doctor's level of care fell below the standard required of a doctor with similar qualifications facing the same medical situation as the doctor you want to sue. Medical testimony must be... View More

No, you cannot sue for anything. If there is a case, it is your mother's case. The hospital may be negligent, but the damages your mother suffered may not justify spending the substantial money and investing the time it takes to prosecute a medical negligence case. If your mother, or her... View More

Unlikely you do but the estate may. As to the hearing aid issue, I don't see legal liability (which is different from moral responsibility). If the family didn't see it should the hospital? If the family saw it they could have replaced it?

Why not contact a member of the W.Va.... View More

You need to speak with the group that is lobbying against it. Who those are I wouldn't know. Look at newpaper articles on it--it will usually say "......however, Billie Joe McAlister, spokesperson for Not So Fast, a group of opiod treatment professionals said that......." With the... View More

A lawyer would need to see the records but it certainly would warrant being looked at. I suggest your dad contact a member of the W.Va.Assn for Justice that handles medical carelessness cases--they give free consultations.

All the bet to your dad.

The length of time to actually get possession of a settlement check can depend on a number of factors including, but not limited to: parties contributing to settlement, if Medicare is involved, if a court needs to approve settlement and satisfaction of any medical lien holders. Some states have... View More

If it isn't the state that got it that way, don't see why not. The law only deals with admissabiltiy of evidence that the state gained through improper activities. If a burglar gets documents and turns them over to the government--let's say a hacker gets emails--those emails can be used as evidence.