The intent-to-use application for EMBERFLY was allowed in 2007, but no statement of use or request for extension was filed. There has been no other application for the same mark. The same application cannot be revived, but a new application should be filed with a statement and specimen of use,... View More

You should be able to acquire the franchise in your personal capacity, then assign it to the company when it is qualified, but the franchisor must understand and agree that you intend to assign the franchise to your company. The company will have to agree to the obligations to the franchisor in... View More

The other attorney's answer to your question omits only one important point:

when there are multiple users of the same (or confusingly similar) mark for the same or similar goods/services, PRIORITY of usage -- "first in time, first in right" -- determines which of them should... View More

A reasonable trademark attorney will give you a break on multiple applications for similar goods or services, only a slight increase over a single application, but the USPTO filing fee for each application will be $250. The elapsed time from application to publication is running about 11 months... View More

Your use of the word "ANIMALS" is merely descriptive of the subject, thus not infringing from a trademark perspective.

An application to register a trademark with the US Patent & Trademark Office can pay additional fees to have the mark registered in other countries under their national registries. Your trademark attorney can explain what countries are available for this feature and how much the fees are.

Although the content of television programs and movies are the subjects of copyright, their titles are not. To use the titles in the way you propose, merely to name them for reference, is legally permissible as "nominative fair use".

There is no infringement in using the names of the copyrighted works and/or links to sources for them.

MOM WALK is the distinctive portion of the four word phrase THE MOM WALK COLLECTIVE, as the first word is merely an article and the last word is merely descriptive, so the proposed usage would be infringing.

The video montage is a new work of expression, copyrightable on its own and not infringing of the game copyright. You are creating it as a "work for hire" and the client will own the copyright.

There is an active registration (#4278394) since 2013 of PARDON MY FRENCH for clothing, so a new application would most likely be refused.

The author of the diary was owner of the copyright without regard for whether it was published or registered, and the copyright is owned after his death by his heirs, who may register and publish it if they wish. The copyright remains valid for the life of the author plus 50 years.

It is not essential to register a trademark before using it, but it would be prudent to be assured that it does not infringe a mark already in use or registered. Consult an experience trademark attorney to perform a clearance search and render an opinion before going forward.

Besides the trademark issue, the visual appearance of the characters may be the subject of copyright.

Use of text or a phrase displayed on apparel does not function as a trademark, but is considered merely "decorative use" and is not registrable. A trademark should be an indicator of the source of goods or services, as a brand.

The application to register PEYTANGER was filed by Shenzhen Baitang Technology Co., Ltd, a Chinese company, through its US attorney Xingyi Tao <taoxingyi@daoleerlaw.com>

Using your competitors' names and trademarks to identify them for comparison purposes is "nominative fair use", as you are merely referring to their names, and it is not infringing of the marks.

If "Lloyd Edward" is the name of a living person, it can be registered as a trademark only with his written permission. There is currently no active registration of either LLOYD or EDWARD for clothing, although there had been registrations for each of them that were abandoned.

The WM WASTE MANAGEMENT federal trademark registration is for the text only (and even disclaims exclusivity for the words alone), and without any claim for color.

MANYINA

Owner Name:

Longxin Wu

Owner Address:

Nanzhouhuayuan,NanzhouSt,Haizhu#906BldC3

Guangzhou, Guangdong CHINA 510000

Legal Entity Type:

INDIVIDUAL

Citizenship:

CHINA