Medford, OR asked in Real Estate Law for Oregon

Q: Deceased witness, prior litigation (public records at courthouse) show important info as Memorandum not depo...hearsay?

We can't find any depositions in the 20 year old case file but the Defendant's Memorandum and even the Judge's final findings of fact and conclusions of law answer the legal question the present day property owners are arguing about (cost allocation for road maintenance). Are these prior court documents self-authenticating and can we use a dead witness' "Memorandum" and other court records filed by his attorney at the time or will they be considered hearsay since they aren't technically "testimony, depositions, or affidavits." The findings of fact and judgement was set aside because the parties settled. Looks like we're now headed to court 20+ years later over the same question of law that was already answered.

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers

A: If you've gotten this far you already know the rule and the exceptions. You problems will be not just the hearsay rule but authenticity, since you apparently have only fragments of the testimony. If there is enough information in the record to lay the required predicate, maybe you get it in.

You've tried to track down the actual transcripts or the shorthand tapes from which they were made, right? If you can find the court reporters that recorded the depositions or in-court testimony, there's a chance that they archived the shorthand tapes from which the transcripts were made (or not made, just recorded). They can trot them out and transcribe them. Cake. If the transcripts are from hearings in court, find out who was the judge's reporter at that time and contact her. It's a long shot but that's where I'd start. If it was appealed, the appellate record might have excerpts from the transcripts, too, and those are archived for a time, maybe electronically even. Sometimes the reporter information is in the exhibits appended to the record. Could also start by contacting the law firms that may have hired the court reporters -- often they use court reporting firms that may keep their tapes a long time. And in the last 20 years they started storing things electronically. Might not be such a long shot, if you can find the reporters.

Was the question of law actually answered with finality? If so, do you have res judicata or collateral estoppel? Same parties? Same claims? Or were the rulings interlocutory? Were they mooted by the settlement and vacatur of the Findings and Conclusions? Is this what you're trying to establish with this information?

Good luck.

A: It is impossible to answer this question based on your short synopsis. You would have to work with an attorney who can review the prior court file and tell you what if anything might assist you with your present case. Testimony in court at a hearing that was given under oath would not be in the paper file but the court may have recordings that you can get and have transcribed by a court reporter. Depositions that were taken by the parties to that case might still exist but would not be filed with the court. Usually attorneys don't store files for more than 10 years so hard to say.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.