Washington, DC asked in Real Estate Law and Landlord - Tenant for Maryland

Q: Water heater broke and leaked water all over basement and we're being asking to replace it

Our water heater broke and leaked water in the basement and the renters didn't respond for at least a week or so. The basement was basically off limits as the carpet was completely soaked and stepping on it resulted in water splashing and soaking further into the carpet. Essentially there was water on the foundation and it couldn't go anywhere so the carpet remained water logged for an extended period of time. Now that we moved out they are asking us to pay $700+ for the replacement because it "couldn't be cleaned." We lived there for 3 years and the carpet had wear on it from general use but my question is, if they allowed water to be soaked into the foundation and carpet for that long, wouldn't they need to replace it anyway due to potential mold and other issues? Thanks

2 Lawyer Answers
Richard Sternberg
Richard Sternberg
Answered
  • Potomac, MD
  • Licensed in Maryland

A: The answer depends on the terms of the lease, who had the insurance interest, and whether anyone was negligent, and the result is fact dependent. While it needs to be reviewed before an opinion can be reached. One thing is certain. Doing nothing until the mold overtakes the house will turn a $700 problem into a much bigger problem. Both the renter and the landlord should report the incident to their homeowner’s or renter’s insurance companies.

Mark Oakley
Mark Oakley
Answered
  • Rockville, MD
  • Licensed in Maryland

A: A water heater failure is a landlord responsibility, not a tenant responsibility, so long as the tenant did not physically damage the water heater that resulted in the leak. It appears, however, that the landlord is blaming you for the carpet damage, specifically, blaming you for a delay in cleaning up the water that they contend would have allowed the carpet to be saved and cleaned and not replaced. This seems like a stretch, but that's a factual dispute that a judge will have to hear and decide. A one week delay, however, is unlikely to be the difference between a salvageable carpet and a carpet that has to be replaced. i imagine the landlord would need an expert witness to testify that the carpet could have been dried out and reused if the situation was addressed earlier. What the cost of that clean-up would have been versus the cost of replacing the carpet is the measure of damages, assuming the clean-up would have been cheaper. Again, the landlord would have to prove that cost that would have had to be incurred had access been granted as claimed.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.