Q: Easement syntax: A right of way and easement, for all purposes, into over and across, upon and in and to ...
I own an Easement in California which crosses 4 lots.
I use it everyday for ingress/egress.
Sometimes I "maintain" both road and bridge on the easement.
I assume it is clear of legal entanglements.
The Easement was granted in 1915.
It is 30 feet wide and about 1000 feet long.
On my Easement document, the ONLY "grant" language is this:
> PARCEL TWO
> A right of way and easement, for all purposes, into over and across,
> upon and in and to that parcel of land and every part thereof,
> described as follows:
> Being a strip of land 30 feet wide and lying 15 feet uniformly on each
> side of the following described center line, to wit:
> Beginning at a pipe driven in the northwesterly line ...
The rest describes easement dimensions.
- Q: What does the above text mean?
- Q: Is "for all purposes" more permissive than: "for ingress/egress".
- Q: Is it odd that the permissions are so brief yet, "strong"?
A: It’s possible that this gives you a very broad easement.
But to give you a firm opinion an attorney would need to look at the subsequent title history of all the properties involved as well as any recorded court history as it is possible the easement was lessened or revised or cancelled over the years.
An easement can also be destroyed by adverse possession or failure to use over the years.
So the answer to your question would require an attorney to do more than interpret the original grant of easement itself, but that would also be necessary as words or even commas or other punctuation can sometimes become quite important.
Is the easement being used by anyone now?
1 user found this answer helpful
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.