Q: In a Qui Tam case, can the relater file a petition to revive judgment, or only the USA can take post-judgment action?
Does the relator have the right to file any motions after the judgment was entered against me on 8/23/2007 in violation of my constitutional 5 amendment rights? I was barred from defending myself pursuant to a Mack Order in a prior case. All documents I filed were returned to me unfiled, and I was not allowed to appear in court. Mack Orders only apply to plaintiffs, not defendants. Additionally, in violation of law, about 75% of my IRA and KEOGH funds were taken away from me to pay part of the judgment. The case was revived in 2014, and the relator filed a motion on 10/2/2021 to again revive the judgment. After the initial judgment was entered against me on 8/23/2007, the USA took action to seize all my assets, including my retirement assets, by filing documents with the court, including asset discovery motions, motions to seize my retirement assets, and other documents and actions in court. My 5th amendment rights were violated, and my exempt IRA and KEOGH were illegally seized.
Sounds like you did not satisfy the original judgment, and the relator is seeking to collect on it. However, it also sounds like the government intervened in the underlying lawsuit and won a judgment against you. It also sounds like you represented yourself in the underlying lawsuit, hence an unfortunate outcome that you are confused about. If you need help to understand what is going on, and you do, you need to consult with an attorney. This is not the forum for that.
THE INFORMATION PROVIDED HERE IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. NOTHING IN THIS ANSWER SHOULD BE TAKEN AS LEGAL ADVICE FOR ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE OR SITUATION. THIS ANSWER IS NOT INTENDED TO CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.