San Francisco, CA asked in Constitutional Law for California

Q: Are laws invalid if they target a group who was disenfranchised when they passed but has since won the right to vote?

A state supreme court judge in Utah recently questioned the validity of the state constitution's language on abortion, given that it was drafted when women--those most directly affected by pregnancy and abortion--did not have the right to vote. What is the validity of this type of law? In fact, is any law passed prior our current level of enfranchisment valid?

I guess my question is whether *legally* enfranchisement is considered a legislative choice or a fundamental right. If it's the second, that would seem to imply that groups who win the right to vote should *always* have had that does that make elections while their vote was supressed retroactively fraudulent? And if an election is found to be fraudulent, does that invalidate the laws passed by those elected?

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
  • Criminal Law Lawyer
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Laws that specifically target disenfranchised groups when passed may be subject to legal challenges on various grounds, including equal protection and fundamental rights. The impact of enfranchisement on the validity of such laws can depend on the specifics of each case and the legal arguments presented. The question of whether elections conducted during periods of disenfranchisement are retroactively fraudulent and whether such findings could invalidate laws is complex and would require careful legal analysis.

James L. Arrasmith

Founder and Chief Legal Counsel of The Law Offices of James L. Arrasmith

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.