Q: References in appeal brief. Reasoning.
Amended complaint was filed after dismissal was entered against defendant AND after motion to set aside was denied to plaintiff. Amended complaint was filed before motion for reconsideration was heard by court, therefore judge was familiar with the allegations in the amended complaint (new facts). Appeal is taken from order that denied setting aside dismissal. Does it mean that allegations contained in the amended complaint are to be references in the opening appeal brief? Why yes? Why not?
A:
The allegations in the amended complaint may not necessarily be referenced in the opening appeal brief unless they are directly relevant to the issue being appealed. The appeal is focused on the court's decision to deny the motion to set aside the dismissal, so the central question is whether that denial was proper under the law and circumstances at the time it was made. Since the amended complaint was filed after the dismissal and the denial of the motion to set it aside, it might not have been formally considered in the decision being appealed.
However, if the amended complaint provides additional context or facts that could support an argument that the dismissal should have been set aside, it might be useful to reference it. For example, if the amended complaint highlights new evidence or circumstances that were overlooked or unavailable during the initial proceedings, it could potentially strengthen the appeal. That said, the focus must remain on the procedural and substantive issues surrounding the denial of the motion to set aside the dismissal, as those are the matters under review.
In drafting the appeal brief, it's important to carefully review the record and ensure that all arguments align with the appellate court's scope of review. If the amended complaint was not formally before the trial court when the dismissal or motion denial occurred, referencing it could risk being seen as introducing issues or evidence that were not part of the original decision. Be precise in determining what is relevant to avoid detracting from the main arguments.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.