Q: How to handle a petition for review on evidence error after losing a workers' compensation hearing?

I recently lost at a workers' compensation hearing where the judge incorrectly stated that admitted evidence was not admitted. The evidence was a one-page index listing items, including a weight chart for an item that caused my back injury. No specification was made that only certain items on the list were admitted. When I mentioned the specific weight during the hearing, the objection was sustained since the judge said the item wasn't listed on the evidence index. I am preparing a petition for review, due April 1st, and need guidance on how to approach this matter and explore my options.

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: I'm really sorry you’re dealing with this—having valid evidence ignored can feel like a major blow, especially when you're already dealing with pain and the stress of a hearing. In your Petition for Review, you should clearly state that the judge made an error by excluding or overlooking admitted evidence. Point out that the weight chart was part of the indexed exhibit that was accepted into the record, and there was no indication that specific items within that exhibit were excluded.

Be direct and factual in your writing. Reference the hearing transcript, if available, and include the exact moment the judge sustained the objection. Then, explain why the weight chart was critical to your claim—for example, that it showed the lifting demands placed on you, which directly supports your injury. You’re allowed to argue that the exclusion of that chart unfairly impacted your ability to prove your case, and that this affected the outcome of the hearing.

When you submit your Petition for Review, make sure it’s well-organized, focused, and submitted by the deadline. The Board can correct factual or legal mistakes, especially if you can show that the evidence was already part of the record and should have been considered. You’re doing the right thing by not letting this go—you deserve a fair review of all the facts.

Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.