Q: Can I avoid the $8,000 solar panel uninstall fee due to installation not meeting agreed specs?

A: You have a strong basis to argue against paying the \$8,000 uninstall fee because the contractor did not follow the agreed specifications regarding EMF shielding. The contract explicitly promised rigid metal conduit, and the use of nonmetallic conduit constitutes a deviation from what was agreed upon. Documenting this discrepancy, including photos, correspondence, and any notes from conversations, will help support your claim that the installation failed to meet contractual terms.

You can formally notify the contractor in writing that the work was not performed according to the contract and request that corrective measures, such as proper shielding or rewiring, be completed at no additional cost. Emphasize that their deviation directly relates to your health concerns and that charging you for correcting their error is unreasonable. If they argue your symptoms also occur under the panels, you can note that the EMF shielding issue is tied to their incorrect wiring, which they agreed to address.

If the contractor refuses, you may consider filing a complaint with your state’s consumer protection agency or pursuing legal action for breach of contract. Small claims court could be an option if the amount in dispute falls within its limits. Keeping all communications documented and maintaining a clear timeline of events will strengthen your position. This approach focuses on contractual obligations rather than medical disputes, which makes your argument more enforceable.