I am not aware of any law that limits the amount of time they have to test it. However, the lengthy delay could be part of a good argument that you could make that the result is not reliable.

If you allege this happened in front of the children, the police *should* be making a CPS referral as part of the reporting process.

There would be a new sentencing. However, if the proofs at trial are basically the same, you would likely get the same sentence as before. The sentence is based on the entirety of the information that the judge knows, so it is possible for the sentence to change based on the difference of the... View More

All the issues you stated could be argued on the initial direct appeal of the conviction . . . except for the discovery of new evidence (which in most instances is brought in a 6500 motion for post conviction relief). However, depending on what the new evidence is, you might have a way to make it... View More

There is no cross examination in grand jury proceedings.

But, if he testifies at trial, an experienced competent criminal defense attorney can impeach him if you have admissible proof that he lied

Not likely. First, court staff are not the judge. You are responsible for complying with orders to appear unless excused by the judge.

It sounds like the court isn't treating it as a big deal now, but you do need to arrange to appear and make sure you are present going forward.... View More

Potentially, this is extortion. Is there any truth to what she's saying? Their power lies in the secrecy of what they have or know about you. Even if you get this person charged with a crime, he or she could still release the information, leaving you with a similar outcome as if you... View More

No, they do not need to present search warrant prior to entry; especially in a raid situation.

You should have a lawyer. From how you phrase the question, there has to be a misunderstanding of what's going on somewhere and you would benefit greatly from a lawyer's explanation.

Lots of questions before there can be any answers. 1) how do you know the drone is tracking you? Generally speaking, even if the drone is tracking you - presumably from the air - you don't have a privacy right walking or driving down the street. Things get trickier if a drone is hovering close... View More

What is your question? Sometimes the impound people will agree to waive or reduce the fees to allow you to get the car out, but otherwise, your car is staying there until the fees are paid.

Not sure what the circumstances are you're asking about. But if you are a victim, your first call should be to the police. They, in conjunction with the prosecutor, will determine what charges are appropriate.

With a guilty plea, you don't have a true right to appeal. There are certain issues you can ask for what's called "leave" to appeal. The Attorney Grievance Commission does not determine malpractice; they determine attorney ethical issues.

At this juncture, after... View More

It's a contract case. State case; small claims actually. Your damages are $780, and maybe any fees your bank charged you.

Are you now charged with a crime? If so, all of this is for him or her to sort out. It would likely start with obtaining a copy of the search warrant and affidavit. If the house was suspected of being involved in a drug ring, you can almost bet that there is some combination of surveillance /... View More

Any charge can be dropped, but charges initiated by police contact are the least likely to be dropped. The good news is without a criminal history, you're unlikely to face much if any jail time, let alone prison. The bad news is that anytime a cop runs your name, it's going to come back... View More

You need to address the validity of that search warrant first. If you can prevail on that, then you have something. If the challenge is unsuccessful, you're free to take it to trial, but what is a jury going to think of the evidence?

No one can properly advise you on whether you should... View More

Yes. Like with all case law research, it's good for a particular purpose, which may differ from your set of facts.

You should have an attorney for the hearing, whose either been appointed or will be made available to you prior to the hearing who can explain. First offense retail fraud you're likely looking at probation maybe.

Typically 48-72 hours.