Paterson, NJ asked in DUI / DWI for New Jersey

Q: I read that my health history can be a defense to a DUI charge if it affected my breathalyzer test - is that true?

Related Topics:
3 Lawyer Answers
H. Scott Aalsberg
H. Scott Aalsberg
Answered
  • DUI & DWI Lawyer
  • East Brunswick, NJ
  • Licensed in New Jersey

A: Yes most definitely your health history can effect the alcotest (breathzlyzer is no longer being used in NJ) Things such as a higher than normal temperature, diabetes, certain blood disorders, Hyperglycemia or Hypo etc. Your lawyer should review this information with you.

James A. Abate agrees with this answer

James A. Abate
James A. Abate
Answered
  • DUI & DWI Lawyer
  • Somerville, NJ
  • Licensed in New Jersey

A: One of the reasons why you want to be talking with a DWI specialist (National College of DUI Defense, ect), is because they are well honed on the scientific defenses. The short answer is your medical mystery might be a defense. It depends on the medical issue and the facts of your case. Practically everything about the DWI case involves science. From the chemical breath test, to blood and uring tests, to the science that (allegedly) underpins the field sobriety tests.

Mr. Kenneth Albert Vercammen
Mr. Kenneth Albert Vercammen
Answered
  • DUI & DWI Lawyer
  • Edison, NJ
  • Licensed in New Jersey

A: Defense to refusal sometimes where person medically unable to provide breath samples

State v. Monaco

444 NJ Super 539 (App. Div. 2016)

In affirming defendant's conviction of driving under the influence and refusal to submit to a chemical breath test, the court address two points related to the refusal conviction. First, applying State v. O'Driscoll, 215 N.J. 461 (2013), the court holds that defendant failed to present evidence that her refusal was materially affected by the failure to inform her that she would be required to install an ignition interlock if convicted.

Second, the court holds that a defendant bears the burden to prove that he or she lacked the physical capacity to perform the chemical breath test. In this case, defendant maintained her asthma rendered her incapable of providing the minimum air volume. Although defendant's treating physician testified about her pulmonary function, the Law Division judge found the proofs were insufficient to establish defendant was incapable of providing the requisite air volume. See also State v Foley

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.