Cleveland, OH asked in Criminal Law for Michigan

Q: Charged with larceny in a building and acquitted, then prosecutor recharged with larceny by conversion. Double jeopardy?

Nothing new, no new evidence, same exact police report. Accused of stealing 8 12 x 12 horse stall mats that were 20+ years old. In 1st trial it was clarified that they were 6 X 12 and a total of 16, then in the Larceny by conversion trial I was found guilty of stealing and converting 60 + stall mats, of which they refused to let me bring back. I have a case of prosecutorial misconduct, (the so called) victim lied over and over and is being investigated for perjury as we speak. I have never been in trouble with the law, and now am a convicted felon being forced to pay restitution for something that they refused to let me bring back (long story). Went to court on the matter in land lord tenant prior to the 1st criminal trial, and it was resolved and I agreed to pay for them as they refused to let me return them. (again-long story) I feel that this is crossover estoppel. These mats were seized-got all of the mats back and my mats, and then I was charged with larceny in a building

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
Brent T. Geers
Brent T. Geers
  • Criminal Law Lawyer
  • Grand Rapids, MI
  • Licensed in Michigan

A: Double jeopardy involves having to answer for the same conduct twice. Larceny from a building and larceny by conversion involve different elements (i.e. one does not involve having to prove anything from taken from a building) - see Blockburger Test.

You may have an estoppel issue with your landlord tenant case. An attorney would need to review the total record to determine what was considered at your criminal trial.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.