Franklin, PA asked in Family Law for Pennsylvania

Q: What is I took a no contest plea and got charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Child (F2) in PA?

Short of a very long story I was wrongfully accused by a pediatrician. This pediatrician accused me of abusing my son, but later on it turned out to be from a medical condition. But unfortunately the prosecutor decided to charge me anyway and now it's to be fought out in court with the accusing doctor and my doctor's. It was said to be a 15 day trial which I could NEVER afford. Well, anyway, they offered me a plea deal. It states Endangering the Welfare of a Child under 6. I am to serve it on house arrest and have supervised contact until I complete all classes and therapy. If I accept this plea, and follow all recommendations do I have a chance of getting my son back?

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
Peter Christopher Lomtevas
Peter Christopher Lomtevas
Answered
  • Brooklyn, NY
  • Licensed in Pennsylvania

A: This is another one of those questions that requires candor that is unpleasant to government and government's supporters to answer fully and accurately. Federal money goes to the states for child protection and certain criminal prosecutions meaning the tail wags the dog, and the outcome can be unpredictable.

A child protection case means the state gets paid. Business minded politicians hand pick judges to understand the need for federal money to pay the judiciary's paychecks. The possibility that a parent abused a child is an opportunity for the state to cash in at the expense of the parent. Given the complexity of a government structure, all of this is not a conflict of interest unless legislatures enact statutes that make it such.

Here, the parent ended up in criminal prosecution. Money buys justice, and the asker informs us she cannot afford a fifteen-day trial. Prosecutors ensure that trials are lengthy so as to discourage trials, and instead to encourage plea bargains.

The question is whether taking a plea bargain will restore possession of the child to the asker. We simply cannot answer this question. The general federal law that governs child abuse and prevention is written to restore family unity, but another statute that concerns adoption and safe family placement of children governs the termination of parental rights and the forced adoption of children. Where the asker falls on this continuum assuming a plea to an EWC charge is a question best answered by her attorney.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.