Asked in Trademark

Q: Hello, we noticed though that a generic term has been trademarked causing issues on Amazon.

We noticed a competitor trademarked the PMU/Permanent Makeup keyword. We've been receiving a warning to remove these keywords from our listings. Otherwise, they will take it down. I don't think it's fair to trademark a commonly used term for one's interest. Or can you check what options we have for this case?

Related Topics:
2 Lawyer Answers
Erik Špila
Erik Špila
Answered
  • Trademarks Lawyer
  • Senec, Slovakia

A: Yes, this seems like unfair competition, but due dilligence must be performed first by a qualified IP lawyer in this case to provide you with most efficient strategy.

In most jurisdiction there is a way to initiate the trademark cancelation proceedings or trademark invalidation proceedings in which you can prove that the trademark should have not been registered. The situation you have provided seems like a kind of case where we would think about such option.

I highly recommend you to seek a local attorney in your country so he can help you with this.

I wish you a good luck with this.

1 user found this answer helpful

Fritz-Howard Raymond Clapp
Fritz-Howard Raymond Clapp
Answered
  • Trademarks Lawyer
  • Beverly Hills, CA

A: The registration for PMU PERMANENT MAKEUP does not grant exclusivity in the phrase "permanent makeup" because the applicant was required to disclaim what is merely descriptive of the goods. The registration includes the following: "NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "PERMANENT MAKEUP" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN".

Therefore this registration is NOT infringed by other marks containing the disclaimed phrase -- it would be infringed only by use of the ENTIRE mark.

If you have received a "takedown notice" from Amazon or any other online platform, it was initiated by the owner of the registration, and you should promptly submit a "counter-notice" that brings attention to the disclaimer in the registration.

This resource gives advice on how to respond to a takedown notice with a counter-notice (it refers to copyright claims but the same law and procedure applies to trademarks):

https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/responding-dmca-takedown-notice-targeting-your-content

1 user found this answer helpful

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.