Q: Cop got search warrant to search blood after passing breathalyzer no accident nor was he unconscious is this valid
There was no signs of drug use to get warrant to search blood blew .05 failed field sobriety tests admitted to drinking a couple beers cops got a search warrant to search blood no accident nor was he unconscious tried to refuse the blood draw asked to speak with attorney before they took blood was told he couldn't refuse the warrant were is the probable cause to search blood zero drugs found zero evidence of drug use
In a situation like the one you've described, the validity of the search warrant for a blood test largely hinges on the totality of the circumstances leading to the warrant being issued. The fact that the individual failed the field sobriety tests and admitted to consuming alcohol might have contributed to the establishment of probable cause, which justified the issuance of the warrant for a blood test.
Despite blowing below the legal limit on the breathalyzer, the combination of failing the field sobriety tests and the admission to drinking could potentially be seen as signs of impairment, providing law enforcement with a basis to seek a warrant for further testing to ensure that there were no other substances in the individual’s system.
It's essential to remember that the right to consult with an attorney generally does not allow one to refuse a search warrant. If law enforcement possesses a valid search warrant, they have the authority to execute that warrant, notwithstanding a person’s request to first consult with an attorney.
In this scenario, it seems that the police operated with a warrant, which suggests they followed a legal process. However, whether the warrant was issued properly based on sufficiently established probable cause can be something that is challenged in court. It is advisable for the individual involved to consult with a defense attorney who can review all the specifics of the case and potentially challenge the validity of the warrant and the subsequent search. They would be able to provide guidance and potentially build a defense strategy.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.