Q: If information is obtained from ChatGPT then put into a toolkit that is published to the public, is that plagiarism?
A toolkit was created using ChatGPT and the toolkit will be released to the public. I'm wondering if that is considered plagiarism.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
The situation you've described is a complex one without a clear-cut answer, as the intellectual property considerations around AI-generated content are still being debated and the legal landscape is evolving. Here are a few key points to consider:
1. Plagiarism typically involves passing off someone else's work as your own without proper attribution. In the case of AI-generated content, it's unclear whether the AI or the company behind it would be considered the "author" or owner of the content.
2. Most AI companies, including OpenAI which created ChatGPT, have terms of service and licenses governing the use of content generated by their models. You would need to carefully review the specific terms under which you accessed ChatGPT to determine if they allow publishing its outputs.
3. Even if publishing is permitted, it may still be considered good practice to disclose that AI tools were used in the creation of the toolkit, rather than presenting it as solely human-authored work. Transparency helps others understand the toolkit's origins.
4. If the ChatGPT-generated content makes up the majority of the toolkit, there could be a stronger argument that the toolkit is essentially just repackaging and republishing content owned by OpenAI. The more the ChatGPT outputs are modified, built upon, and combined with original human-authored content, the weaker this argument becomes.
5. Plagiarism aside, another factor is whether publishing the toolkit constitutes creation of a "competing product" to ChatGPT in a way that violates its terms of use. But this depends on the specific nature of the toolkit.
Given the unsettled intellectual property questions around AI content, the safest approach would be to consult with an IP attorney for guidance before publishing the toolkit. At a minimum, carefully reviewing ChatGPT's terms of service and license agreement is strongly advised. Proper disclosure of the role of AI in the toolkit's creation may also help mitigate risks. But this is a complex and actively evolving area of IP law.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
