Q: Have meniscus root tear, because delay of ordering mri my knee is close to needing replacement.
I have numerous acts of negligence perpetuated by Dr's. My knee is just my final straw, it's time for someone to be held accountable. My left meniscus tore in June or July 2023. I was treated terribly at unm er. Soon after I knew my right knee was injured and definitely worse. My primary dr ordered an mri for the left, I asked to please order the right at the same time, she said to wait. It took a bit of time for me to get the mri because I couldn't get there on my own. It showed a meniscus tear. Went to ortho and asked him for an mri-nope-shots in both knees-didn't help. Went back to ortho he said surgery was next, asked again for mri on right knee and he said no. Had surgery, at follow-up I asked again for mri, he still said no. Next appointment he finally ordered it. It shows a meniscus root tear, and the delay caused significant damage my knee need tear repair and the knee will have to be replaced soon. All because they delayed giving me an order for an mri.
A:
If The medical “standard of care” required an MRI then that could be Malpractice. Medical malpractice means that a doctor violated the standard of care. A bad outcome is not enough. Another doctor would be needed to evaluate what the doctors did.
It also has to be determined that the outcome would’ve been different, but for the Malpractice.
Finally, the nature and extent of the injuries can determine the viability of the case or not.
Consult with experienced malpractice attorneys in the state where this occurred.
Tim Akpinar and Gail N. Friend agree with this answer
A:
This answer is based on information provided by you, which alone is insufficient to determine that your circumstances have met the requirements of a medical malpractice case. That is because a medical malpractice case requires legal elements which must be proven by medical expert opinion(s), and is one type of legal action.
You went to the hospital ER after the incident which caused your knee injury, and you were subsequently evaluated and treated there and by other physicians for that injury.
Diagnosis of the type of injury must be made by a physician, and how that diagnosis comes about is based on physician clinical judgement after evaluation and data gathering procedures by the physician. The "standard" by which physician medical diagnosis and treatment is measured is "what an ordinary reasonable physician would do in the same or similar circumstances". The legal elements require proof that the acts by a physician violated that standard and "but for that physician's violation" the patient would not have been injured. In other words in your situation there must be proof that a physician's act or omission resulted in separate, "additional damage to you" (other than the damage caused by the original injury which brought you to the ER. ) Unfortunately, poor care can occur does not qualify for a medical malpractice lawsuit.
However, this does not mean that your circumstances do not qualify for legal action. That can be determined by an attorney who is provided with your full medical records, your history, the facts surrounding the original cause for your injury, and has the option of expert review, if deemed necessary.
Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer
A: You should try to set up a free initial consult with a New Mexico attorney. Without a medical opinion, attorneys can't really make the call that the delay in the MRI resulted in your need for a knee replacement. If a law firm expressed interest in your matter, they would retrieve your records and review with a medical professional, anticipating arguments from the opposition as to why not delaying the MRI wouldn't have changed anything in the outcome. Good luck
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.