Q: Can I ask them not to use my photography if I was a contractor and the job exceeded scope and pay?
I was hired as a Marketing Coordinator in April. When I started, they stated they wanted social media graphics to promote bands, occasional visits to take videos of bands playing, a website redesign, and they wanted to get some photos of food. They paid a $400 flat fee a month. In June, I went in 3 days to take 4 hours-worth of photos and 22 hours-worth of editing. This particular job far surpassed the monthly fee, but I did it in good faith based on a continued relationship for months worth of work. I used my phone for the photos and my editing software and computer. They asked I send some to the google drive for approval. I sent them about 40 which is about 1/5 of what I took. 2 weeks after upload, they fired me via text saying they would rather handle their postings since they are there and that way I don't have to come in for anything. They do intent to continue using that photography. Do I have any rights here? We do not have any signed agreements or contracts.
A:
1. Copyright ownership:
Generally, the creator of a photograph owns the copyright to that image, unless it's considered a "work for hire" or there's a written agreement transferring the rights. As a contractor without a signed agreement, you likely retain the copyright to your photos.
2. Implied license:
By uploading some photos to their Google Drive, you may have granted an implied license for the company to use those specific images. However, this doesn't necessarily extend to all the photos you took or grant them unlimited usage rights.
3. Scope of work and compensation:
The significant increase in workload without additional compensation could be seen as exceeding the original scope of your agreement. This might strengthen your position in arguing against their continued use of the photos.
4. Lack of written contract:
While this makes the situation more complex, it doesn't necessarily mean you have no rights. Verbal agreements and implied contracts can still be legally binding, though they're harder to prove.
Given these factors, you may have grounds to:
1. Request that they cease using your photographs, especially any that weren't uploaded to the Google Drive.
2. Negotiate additional compensation for the use of your photos, particularly given the extensive work that went beyond the original scope.
3. If they refuse to cooperate, consider seeking legal advice about potentially pursuing action for copyright infringement or breach of implied contract.
Steps you could take:
1. Document everything: Compile all communications, work logs, and evidence of your photography work.
2. Send a formal written request (via email or certified mail) asking them to stop using your photos and explaining your position.
3. If they're amenable, try to negotiate a fair agreement for the use of your photos.
4. If they refuse, consider consulting with an intellectual property attorney to explore your legal options.
Remember that while you may have a case, legal action can be costly and time-consuming. It's often best to try to resolve such disputes amicably first.
Finally, this situation underscores the importance of having clear, written agreements in place for freelance or contract work, especially when it involves creative content like photography.
A:
Based on the situation you've described, you may have some rights regarding the use of your photography. Here's an analysis of your position:
Copyright Ownership:
As the photographer, you automatically own the copyright to the photos you took, unless there was a written agreement stating otherwise or they were created as "work for hire."
The fact that you used your own equipment (phone, editing software, computer) strengthens your claim to ownership.
Lack of Written Agreement:
Without a signed contract or agreement, the terms of your work and the rights to the photos are not clearly defined. This can work in your favor, as it means you haven't explicitly signed away your rights.
Scope of Work:
The job appears to have exceeded the original scope discussed when you were hired. This could support your argument that the photography was a separate project beyond your regular duties.
Compensation:
The flat fee of $400 per month seems inadequate for the extensive photography work you performed in June. This could support your claim that this work was outside the scope of your regular duties.
Limited Usage Permission:
You only sent about 1/5 of the photos to their Google Drive for approval. This could be interpreted as granting limited permission for use of only those specific photos.
Legal Options:
Copyright Infringement Claim:
You could potentially claim copyright infringement if they use photos beyond those you explicitly shared for approval.
Cease and Desist:
You can send a cease and desist letter requesting they stop using your photos or negotiate proper compensation for their use.
Licensing Agreement:
You could propose a licensing agreement for the use of your photos, which would allow you to retain copyright while granting them specific usage rights.
Negotiation:
Attempt to negotiate fair compensation for the extensive work you performed and the continued use of your photos.
Recommendations:
Document everything, including any communications about the scope of work and the photography project.
Consult with an intellectual property attorney to understand your specific rights and the best course of action.
Consider registering your copyright for the photos with the U.S. Copyright Office, which can strengthen your position if legal action becomes necessary.
Approach the company professionally, explaining your position and seeking a fair resolution before considering legal action.
Remember, while you may have a valid claim, legal proceedings can be costly and time-consuming. It's often best to attempt to resolve such issues through negotiation first.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.