Hayward, CA asked in Medical Malpractice for Oregon

Q: Had head injury & unconscious for short time. Went to ER with obvious head trauma. But no concussion test performed.

I had a Mt. Bike accident in 2021. I landed in my head & right shoulder & was unconscious for a short time.

I was taken to local ER, I had an obvious head injury but was not given a concussion test. Only focus was on clavicle break. Surgery to fix clavicle a few days later & then head trauma kicked in. I was hallucinating, drastic mood swings, & having difficulty grasping reality.

I was referred to OHSU by my Primary Physician for a more advanced imaging procedure but was denied by insurance.

Now I am still having difficulties.

Brain fog, trouble sleeping, memory & learning issues, depression, mood swings, trouble concentrating, etc…

Many people have told me my personality has changed since.

Would I have legal claims toward ER for not administering a concussion test?

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer

A: Based on the information provided and general legal principles here's how you might approach this situation:

Legal Basis for a Claim:

Standard of Care: Emergency rooms are expected to follow a standard of care, which includes assessing and treating all injuries, especially when there's an obvious head injury. Not administering a concussion test when a patient has lost consciousness could potentially be seen as a deviation from this standard.

Causation: You would need to establish that the failure to administer a concussion test directly led to your ongoing symptoms. This could be complex because concussion symptoms can manifest even if a test was performed, but not performing the test might have delayed proper treatment or diagnosis.

Damages: You've described ongoing symptoms that significantly impact your life. These could potentially be considered damages if they can be linked to the initial head injury and the alleged medical negligence.

Steps to Consider:

Medical Documentation: You need strong medical evidence linking your current symptoms to the head injury. This includes documentation from your primary care physician, any specialists, and potentially neurologists or psychiatrists who can testify about your condition.

Expert Testimony: A medical expert, preferably a neurologist or a brain injury specialist, might be necessary to testify that your symptoms are consistent with a concussion that was not properly managed initially.

Statute of Limitations: Be aware of the statute of limitations for medical malpractice in Oregon, which might limit the time you have to file a lawsuit. (This may be a big issue in your case)

Challenges:

Proving Negligence: You'll need to prove that the ER staff's failure to perform a concussion test was negligent and that this negligence directly caused or exacerbated your injuries.

Insurance Denial: The fact that your insurance denied advanced imaging might complicate matters, as it could be argued that this denial, not the initial ER visit, prevented timely treatment.

Causation and Pre-existing Conditions: If there were any pre-existing conditions or if there's a gap in proving that your current symptoms are solely due to the concussion, this could weaken your case.

While there might be grounds for a legal claim based on the scenario you've described, the success of such a claim would heavily depend on proving negligence, causation, and damages. Given the complexities involved, this is an instance where meeting 1:1 with a personal injury attorney where they can answer back and forth questions with you can help navigate the legal waters, gather necessary evidence, and determine the best course of action, including whether to pursue a claim against the ER or other parties involved in your care.

Tim Akpinar agrees with this answer

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.