North Versailles, PA asked in Employment Law for Pennsylvania

Q: Can I pursue litigation a a previous employer if they let me go because I am a recovering drug addict?

I work for a medical insurance company. I have a previous history of substance abuse issues. I am certain my supervisor can view this info. I cannot prove they have ever accessed it, but I can prove that they have the capability of accessing it. In a recent meeting, I was told that “if I want to, I can take about 3 days off to resolve any issues I have, and it’s all confidential.” This is after being written up for a legitimate reason. I have never indicated to my employer that I might need a few days off for any medical condition- I feel that because of the way they phrased this comment, that they were implying that I seek treatment for my previous addiction and have accessed my health records. I feel they may be biased against me and may be seeking to terminate me after they’ve seen my records. If I get let go from my job, could I pursue litigation? Thanks for any input

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer

A: A: Hello,

My name is Dash. I'm a PA attorney with Equal Justice Solutions, a public interest law firm that represents employees.

I'm sorry to hear you have struggled with your addiction. It sounds like you are doing better, and we hope this issue at work isn't too disruptive.

I hesitate to give you specific information, because I don’t have all the facts. However, you are welcome to reach out to our firm for a free consultation: https://equaljusticesolutions.org/employment-discrimination-and-retaliation

With that disclaimer, here is some general information:

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination because of disability. It also prohibits retaliation because of complaining about disability discrimination or asking for “reasonable accommodations.” Other laws, such as the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act and Section 1557 of the ACA provide similar protections.

The general rule is that the ADA protects employees from discrimination because they previously struggled with addiction or are seeking treatment for addiction. By contrast, someone who actively uses illegal drugs is not considered to be “disabled” under the ADA.

Therefore, it’s usually illegal for a company to discriminate against someone simply because they used to struggle with addiction, or are currently in recovery. It's not illegal for them to fire someone for using illegal drugs or coming to work intoxicated.

Now, just because something is illegal, doesn’t mean an employee will be able to prove it. A common defense in disability litigation is that the employer can’t have discriminated because they didn’t know about the disability. Putting a company on notice of a disability (and need for accommodations) in a way that both triggers the company’s legal obligations in an obvious way, while also not escalating the situation is a delicate art. Ideally, the notice is in writing, and in a polite, respectful tone. It's often a good idea to consult a lawyer for specifics.

Additionally, employers often try to build a fake “paper trail” of seemingly legitimate write-ups to make it look like they weren’t discriminating. This is called "pre-text." Adequate documentation is often critical to proving pretext.

Note, just because an employee may have done something wrong, doesn't mean they weren't discriminated against. For example, in Summa v. Hofstra University, Lauren Summa complained to her employer about discrimination. Shortly after complaining, the employer launched an investigation into her, and fired her because she incorrectly reported her timesheets. Although the time sheets were inaccurate, the court still held that the employer could be liable for discrimination and retaliation, because it was possible the employer only did the investigation after Ms. Summa reported, and no other employees were disciplined.

Finally, you mentioned another thing in your question—accessing employee health records. The general rule is the law prohibits employers on going on fishing expeditions in employee medical records. While they can ask for documentation, such as doctor notes, to corroborate requests for accommodation, they are not (usually) entitled to all medical records.

Further, if an employer is a healthcare provider and accesses an employee’s records who is also a patient, they may be in violation of HIPPA, as well as state laws that protect privacy. If they take money from the government, this may constitute a violation of the False Claims Act, which offers whistleblowers large financial rewards.

This is a lot, but hopefully it provides some helpful general information. If you feel you need more information, please reach out.

Sending prayers and good thoughts for your continued recovery.

Best,

Dash

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.