Q: What are requirements for a malpractice suite?
A: Depends on the type of case. In North Carolina, there are VERY STRICT filing requirements and deadlines for claims of Medical Negligence.
Introduction to Rule 9(j). In 1995, the North Carolina General Assembly created Rule 9(j) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure to require medical malpractice complaints to include an assertion that the “medical care” was reviewed by a qualified professional willing to testify that the acts or omissions fell below the standard of care.
Closely tied to this requirement, North Carolina Rule of Evidence 702 was also amended to include various qualifications for experts testifying in North Carolina courts.
The prefiling certification requirement of Rule 9(j) was designed to prevent frivolous medical malpractice litigation. Since its effective date of October 1, 1996, however, it has been the source of over 100 published and unpublished opinions attempting to interpret its undefined provisions, reconcile it with other civil procedure rules, and address other questions of applicability.
A: First that there was harm caused by someone violating the "standard of care" for doctors of that type of medicine--specialists are held to a higher standard than generalists; big hospitals held to a higher standard than rural hospitals. This means if you gathered many doctors in a room and said "here's how the patient was, here are their tests, x rays, history, what would you do, " if 90% say do x and the doctor does y then the doctor had better have the greatest reason for not doing x IF HARM RESULTS. I say that because I get a lot of questions from people where maybe there was a violation of the standard of care, but fortunately someone else caught it before real harm could happen. In that case, no case.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.