Q: Patents - Utility - regarding sophistication required of preferred embodiment to justify provisional protection.
For the sake of business expediency, is it OK to 'cobble' together a less-than-desirable solution and use that as proof of concept, and then write the claims off of that? The go-to-market solution would require a better mousetrap but it would get the patent part going. So would the utility claims of what this accomplishes keep out the better mousetraps? (I appreciate this is a broad, theoretical question and specifics need evaluation by an atty.) Hoping this would bring the product status to a 'realistic' provisional patent providing minimum 'enough' protection to be able to approach potential partners or investors needed to develop the 'better mousetrap'.
This is a very question frequent question in R&D. It rare that a company has a project, comes up with a product that is optimized. Normally, researchers come up with a viable product, which is then refined to make the product better, and which can be sold.
The answer is, yes, an invention that is less than optimal is patentable. You want to be able to stake out the ground as early as possible.
However, you need to be cautious. It is important that the product, composition, or method that you have invented is finished. You cannot get a patent on something that is just 50% or 80% finished; you can't claim "a product comprising (a), (b), (c), and something else that we'll figure out later." In other words, you must have finished inventing the invention, i.e., you must have a well-defined invention that is fixed in your mind.
Also, you need to make sure that you disclose the best embodiment to your knowledge at the time of the filing, even if you know that there may better embodiments if you were to spend some more time on it.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.