Q: Do you go to court to challenge a search warrant (call witnesses, etc) or submit the challenge in writing?
Challenging a search warrant begins with a motion to suppress. The classic case that is nearing 30,000 citations from other cases in the country is Franks v. Delaware. Here is quote from that case.
"... where the defendant makes a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the warrant affidavit, and if the allegedly false statement is necessary to the finding of probable cause, the Fourth Amendment requires that a hearing be held at the defendant's request." Franks v. Delaware, 438 US 154, 155–56, 98 S Ct 2674, 2676, 57 L Ed 2d 667 (1978).
To get to a so-called Franks hearing, you must present a motion to the court supported by one or more affidavits that state with specificity what went wrong exactly in the warrant affidavit. That means, not any generalities, but specific incidents of the bad stuff used by the police to get a judge or magistrate to sign off on the warrant. If the motion and affidavit make a strong enough case as to wrong doing, and the judge thinks that, if your contention is correct, then maybe the warrant wouldn't have been issued (i.e., it was "necessary to the finding of probably cause") and then you get to have a Franks hearing.
If you win the argument at the Franks hearing (i.e., pretrial, no jury yet), then the court will suppress certain things that may go beyond even what was discovered in the search (i.e., fruits of the search).
Your odds are not strong in putting together a winning case of this sort without considerable legal training and experience. This whole line of argument also plays better from a third-party (i.e., your attorney). This is because, well, the judge and the attorneys on both sides know what evidence there is. Basically the defense attorney is arguing for a technical foul, where, in some cases, much of the good evidence for the prosecution is excluded from ever reaching a jury. If the defendant is lucky, the prosecutions case might not have enough stuff to go forward to trial.
Get a local attorney to go over your specific facts. This type of motion is heavily fact specific.
Disclaimer: The response given is not intended to create, nor does it create an ongoing duty to respond to questions. The response does not form an attorney-client relationship, nor is it intended to be anything other than the educated opinion of the author. It should not be relied upon as legal advice. The response given is based upon the limited facts provided by the person asking the question. To the extent additional or different facts exist, the response might possibly change.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.