Q: I would like to know if I have a possible medical malpractice case.
Back in November of 2019, I injured my knee stepping off of a bus at work, I started a workmans comp claim the following day. My first MRI showed a tear in my miniscus, and I was recommended physical therapy. I went for about 2 months, a few times a week. During the harder weeks of therapy, I had an incident where my knee locked up, and she told me I was strong enough and didnt require rehabilitation, rather I needed surgery. In my second MRI it showed I have new tearing in my knee. I have recieved no treatment, due to my workmans comp insurance denying liability and it's now nearly July. My treating doctor then requested I do an FCE in an attempt to close my case and return back to work, and I've been in unbearable pain ever since. Currently trying to see my specialist to get another MRI to document the damage.
A: If the Carrier is denying the tear to your knee and possible subsequent re-tear, my advice would be to contact a qualified workers' comp attorney. This matter will most likely need to go to the administrative hearing level to force the Carrier to accept your injury.
Roy Lee Warren agrees with this answer
A: I'm sorry for your situation. You ask whether you could have a medical malpractice claim. The WC Appeals Panel Manual provides the following:
An IW who has sustained a compensable injury is not limited to compensation of merely the compensable
injury itself if the injury, or any proper or necessary treatment of the injury, causes other injuries in addition
to the original compensable injury. Western Cas. & Surety Co. v. Gonzales, 518 S.W.2d 524 (Tex. 1975);
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Sosa, 425 S.W.2d 871 (Tex. Civ. App.—San Antonio 1968, writ ref’d n.r.e. per curiam,
432 S.W.2d 515 (Tex. 1968)). The question to be resolved in an extent of injury issue is whether the claimed
condition is causally related to or is a part of the compensable injury. APD 971725. Where the matter of
causation of the claimed injury is beyond common knowledge or experience, expert evidence to a
reasonable degree of medical probability is required. Houston General Insurance Company v. Pegues, 514
S.W.2d 492 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana 1974, writ ref’d n.r.e.). The IW bears the burden to prove the extent of
his or her compensable injury. APD 001602. Extent of injury is a question of fact for the HO to resolve. APD 960407; APD 050031-s.
So I believe you may be limited to the remedy available under the WC Act, to seek benefits as allowed rather than sue for medical malpractice.
1 user found this answer helpful
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.