Q: a corrupt doctor had my supportive care ended, the lawyer and insurance co were complicit ! I have documentation please
Please help, the attorney made false pleadings to the judges, the doctor did not even see me for 10 minutes and never examined me.
the recent laws changed helped them to squash my pleadings. I've gone as far as I can . they made so many lies that can be proven with electronic files. The hearings were a joke , I was told I should have an attorney or just yelled at during the hearings. I could not get an attorney because my case was settled years earlier and nobody would take it. I am still on the same medicines, same doctor etc, for years the only thing is I will owe thousands in doctor visits. I already pay my pharmacy. This is about a doctor that was a ins. co . pawn. They lied to get me to AZ. and that's all they wanted for me to show up. When I tried to ask the doctor questions in the hearing he claimed amnesia, and said he sees 2 to 3 thousand patients a year and does 50 to 60 IME's a year, I figured it out and even at the lowest figure that is 12.5 patients per day in a year.
MORE INFO NEEDED.
YOU NEED A LAWYER THAT IS WILLING AND CAPABLE OF HANDLING THIS MATTER ON A CONTINGENCY......IT IS NOT MY FIRM AS WE DON'T DO THAT KIND OF MATTER.
MOST LAWYERS DO NOT WANT TO THROW THEIR OWN MONEY AT LITIGATION THAT MAY BE STALE?
I ASSUME IF THIS WAS A GREAT CASE, THAT SOME OF THE LAWYERS WITH WHOM YOU SPOKE, WOULD CONSIDER IT. THE FACT THAT LAWYERS HAVE REJECTED THE MATTER SUGGESTS IT MAY NOT HAVE THE VALUE YOU THINK IT HAS.
Nancy J. Wallace agrees with this answer
A: The trouble with this scenario is the damage was done when this doctor was selected. There is no mechanism for a lawyer to get paid anything in this fact pattern. I read there already were hearings. This means a judge has made a ruling. A ruling has to be appealed within a few days. PLUS there has to have been a judge error in the hearing to appeal. Just having a different opinion than the judge is NOT a 'judicial error'. IF YOU HAD documentary evidence that this physician was not factual, the WCAB Judge would have made a finding on that and dismissed the physician's reports as evidence. It appears this was not done. Sadly, there is nothing more to do now but to warn others to have an attorney before selecting the QME/IME physician; once a doctor 'in bed' with an insurer writes his report, you're sort of 'married' to him. You cannot, as they say, "unring the bell".
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.