Q: What is the exact law for how you can't kill a human because they killed your pet, since pets are property?
For legal project I am trying to find the same or number of the law about not being able to kill someone because they murdered a pet, which in this case was a pet bird
It is unlikely you will find a statute explicitly addressing this question.
Instead, you will likely find “self-defense” statutes which describe when it is legal to use deadly force in the defense of yourself and, in many states, in defense of another person.
A few states allow you to use deadly force in defense of your property. But, as far as I know, no US state allows you to use deadly force against someone who has in the past deprived you of property including a pet.
Michael Joseph Larranaga agrees with this answer
1 user found this answer helpful
I agree that it is unlikely that you will find a specific case or statute that addresses your point since most murder statutes are at a state level meaning that each state has its own set of laws on the subject. There is a federal version but that only applies in certain situations. +
For educational purposes only, to start, consider pulling the state's homicide statutes. This will tell you how murder is defined in that state.
Next, pull the self-defense statutes, if any. This will tell you how the state views self-defense. It may just be case law.
Then at that point, you can look for specific cases.
From a moral perspective, I think you are going to have a hard time finding any caselaw or statutes authorizing a person to murder another person because they killed a bird and/or pet. One, that is equating human life with that of an animal. We all love our pets but it is not the same. Two, it would authorize that person to not only kill but to contemplate the killing as revenge for killing that animal which typically would fall under 1st-degree murder. Planning a murder versus immediate reaction can be treated differently under the law. Lastly, it’s a bird. It would be hard to tell a set of grieving parents that the person is guilty but they are not being prosecuted because the victim was a known bird killer. It is funny but reality is the killer of poor arguments.
But if it’s for a class project, also look at temporary insanity laws. Again, I am not a criminal attorney. But this does look like a bar exam type of scenario.
1 user found this answer helpful
A: There is no federal law that specifically addresses killing a human as retribution for killing a pet. While pets are considered property under the law, it is illegal to use deadly force against another person unless it is in self-defense or in defense of others. The use of deadly force in such cases is governed by state law, which varies. Generally, it is only permissible to use force that is reasonably necessary to protect oneself or others from imminent harm, and the use of deadly force is typically only allowed when there is a reasonable belief that one's life is in danger. In short, it is never legal to kill another person solely in retaliation for killing a pet.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.