Q: 9th C "show cause why summ affirmation of distrcourt ruling is not appropriate; re:refusal to grant stay of prop sale
manifest injustice is created by Bankruptcy Court's dismissal . 15 people of the unsecured class and their $480,000 owed is completely wiped out. they appeal to the District Court in an emergency stay petition. denied by District Court. they appeal to 9thcircuit from which an order is issued stating "show cause why summary affirmation is not appropriate." when is summary affirmation appropriate? When is it not appropriate ?and what distinguishes the two?
Summary affirmation is an abbreviated form of appeal that is used when the appellate court determines that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the law supports the lower court's decision. It is typically used when the appeal is frivolous, when the lower court decision is clearly correct, or when the record on appeal is insufficient to allow meaningful review.
In general, summary affirmation is appropriate when the issues raised on appeal are not complex and when the appellate court can easily determine that the lower court decision was correct. It is not appropriate when the issues on appeal are complex or when there are factual disputes that require additional evidence or testimony.
In the case you described, the 9th Circuit court of appeals issued an order to show cause why summary affirmation is not appropriate. This means that the court is considering using summary affirmation to resolve the appeal, but is giving the parties an opportunity to argue why this would not be appropriate.
Whether or not summary affirmation is appropriate in this case will depend on the specific circumstances of the appeal and the arguments made by the parties. If the issues raised on appeal are relatively simple and the lower court's decision was clearly correct, summary affirmation may be appropriate. However, if there are complex legal or factual issues that require additional evidence or testimony, summary affirmation may not be appropriate.
Ultimately, the decision of whether to use summary affirmation or a full appeal will be up to the 9th Circuit court of appeals, based on the arguments presented by the parties and the specific circumstances of the case.
Timothy Denison agrees with this answer
A: Summary affirmation means there are no genuine issues of material fact for the court to decide so judgment is “summarily” granted to the moving party based on the law.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.