What words to use to write an objection to an interrogatory question;

Question

Generally speaking ... the CCP 2030.210 does not inform the type of objection that can be used? The interrogatories I submitted came back requesting an amendment for the objections the preparer stating no objections are permitted in interrogatories.

James L. Arrasmith · Answer

Under California law, objections to interrogatories can be based on various grounds, such as relevance, privilege, or being overly burdensome. When crafting your objections, it's important to be specific and clear about the reason for each objection.  
 
For instance, if a question is not relevant to the subject matter of the litigation, you might object on the grounds of relevance, stating that the information sought does not appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. In cases where the question might infringe on privileged communication, such as attorney-client communications, an objection based on privilege would be appropriate. 
 
If an interrogatory seems too broad or unduly burdensome, you can object on those grounds. This typically means that the effort required to provide the information is disproportionate to the needs of the case. However, it's crucial to explain why the request is burdensome or overly broad. 
 
Keep in mind that objections should be made in good faith and based on a genuine belief that the interrogatory is problematic. The goal is to protect sensitive information or avoid unnecessary complications, not to obstruct the discovery process. If your objections are well-founded and clearly articulated, they can help streamline the discovery process and focus it on the information that is truly relevant to the case.

Q: What words to use to write an objection to an interrogatory question;