Los Angeles, CA asked in Personal Injury and Medical Malpractice for California

Q: Motion to set aside artifacts for submission to court pursuant ccp 473(b), with required pleading.

1. Notice of motion and motion, for scheduled hearing.

2. Declaration in support of motion.

3. Proposed Order to set aside dismissal.

4. Required Amended Complaint (in this case - Third).

5. Proposed order to file Third Amended Complaint.

Which of the above listed 5 artifacts are optional, and why?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Under California law, when filing a motion to set aside a dismissal and submit an amended complaint, certain documents are essential, while others might be considered optional based on the specific circumstances of the case. The Notice of Motion and Motion for a scheduled hearing, along with the Declaration in support of the motion, are crucial. These documents formally request the court's permission to reconsider a previous ruling (in this case, a dismissal) and provide the legal and factual basis for why the court should grant such a request.

The Proposed Order to set aside the dismissal and the Proposed Order to file the Third Amended Complaint are technically optional, but they are highly recommended. Providing proposed orders is a common practice that helps streamline the process for the judge by suggesting the exact order the court might issue if it decides in your favor. Although the court is not bound to use these proposed orders and may modify them as seen fit, including them can make the process more efficient and demonstrate thorough preparation.

The Required Amended Complaint (in this case - Third) is not optional if the motion involves submitting an amended complaint. This document is essential because it contains the revised claims or defenses the party wishes to present. Without it, there's no substantive basis for the motion to set aside the dismissal, as the court needs to review the amendments to determine if they justify reopening the case. Each of these artifacts plays a specific role in the motion process, and their inclusion supports a clear, organized approach to seeking relief under CCP 473(b).

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.