Q: Response to request to authorize release of medical records (opposition vs motion for protective order)
Opposition versus motion for protective order. Which response is more effcient?
A:
In California, when faced with a request to authorize the release of medical records, both an opposition and a motion for a protective order can be effective responses, depending on the specific circumstances of the case. Here's a comparison of the two approaches:
Opposition:
1. An opposition is a response filed by the party objecting to the release of medical records.
2. It argues against the relevance, necessity, or appropriateness of the requested records.
3. The opposition must provide legal and factual grounds for why the records should not be released.
4. This approach is generally less time-consuming and less expensive than filing a motion for a protective order.
5. However, an opposition may not provide the same level of protection as a court-issued protective order.
Motion for a Protective Order:
1. A motion for a protective order is a formal request to the court to limit or prevent the disclosure of medical records.
2. The moving party must demonstrate good cause for the protective order, such as the sensitive nature of the records or the potential for harm if the records are released.
3. If granted, a protective order carries the weight of a court order, providing a higher level of protection than an opposition.
4. However, filing a motion for a protective order is generally more time-consuming and expensive than filing an opposition.
5. A protective order can also be more effective in setting specific limitations on the use and disclosure of the records.
In summary, an opposition is generally more efficient in terms of time and cost, while a motion for a protective order provides a higher level of protection if granted. The most appropriate response depends on factors such as the sensitivity of the records, the potential for harm if released, and the overall strategy of the case.
It is advisable to consult with an attorney experienced in handling medical record disputes to determine the best course of action based on the specific facts of the case.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
