Los Angeles, CA asked in Personal Injury for California

Q: Validity of motion for protective order as response to motion to compel.

Which CCP defines Motion for protective order as valid response to motion to compel ?

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered
  • Sacramento, CA
  • Licensed in California

A: Under California law, a motion for a protective order is a valid response to a motion to compel. This is governed by Section 2031.060 of the California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP).

CCP § 2031.060(a) states:

"When a party to whom an inspection demand has been directed fails to serve a timely response to it, that party waives any objection to the demand, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product under Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 2018.010). However, the court, on motion, may relieve that party from this waiver on its determination that both of the following conditions are satisfied:

(1) The party has subsequently served a response that is in substantial compliance with Sections 2031.210, 2031.220, 2031.230, 2031.240, and 2031.280.

(2) The party's failure to serve a timely response was the result of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect."

Furthermore, CCP § 2031.060(b) provides:

"The party making the motion for relief from the waiver shall also serve a copy of the motion on all other parties on which the demand was served, and the other parties may oppose the motion."

So in summary, CCP § 2031.060 establishes that a motion for a protective order, if granted by the court, can relieve a party from the waiver of objections that would otherwise result from failing to respond to a motion to compel in a timely manner, provided certain conditions are met.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.