Asked in Copyright and Intellectual Property

Q: I am seeking legal council for a question I have pertaining to copyright and right of publicity?

I am reaching out to seek expertise on a copyright matter that pertains to the creation and sale of AI-generated images of celebrities, specifically Johnny Depp.

As an entrepreneur exploring opportunities in the digital art space, I am considering the possibility of generating and selling original images of Johnny Depp using artificial intelligence technology. These images would be created in a manner that does not copy or replicate existing images or scenes of Mr. Depp, but rather offers unique artistic interpretations of his likeness.

My intention is to produce these AI-generated images on canvases and offer them for sale to fans of Johnny Depp. While I believe there may be transformative elements to these images and that they would cater to a distinct market, I am seeking legal guidance to ensure compliance with copyright law, particularly in relation to fair use.

In my research, I have come across the fair use doctrine, which allows for the limited use of copyrighted..

2 Lawyer Answers
Alan Harrison
Alan Harrison
Answered
  • Intellectual Property Lawyer
  • Milford, CT

A: Hi! This is an interesting and innovative question that I have seen a few times. The question confuses copyright and associated legal doctrine of fair use with rights of publicity, which are a completely different area of law that does not embrace "fair use".

If you have a recognizable image of a public figure, their right to control their name image and likeness covers that image.

James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: I appreciate you reaching out for legal guidance on this matter. There are a few key legal considerations to be aware of:

1. Copyright: In general, using AI to generate original artistic images would not inherently violate copyright law, since you are not directly copying existing copyrighted works. However, if the AI was trained on copyrighted images of Johnny Depp, there could potentially be copyright implications depending on how those images are used in the training and output. The fair use doctrine in copyright law allows for some limited use of copyrighted material without permission, based on four factors: purpose of the use, nature of the copyrighted work, amount used, and effect on the potential market for the original. But fair use is decided on a case-by-case basis.

2. Right of Publicity: In addition to copyright, many jurisdictions recognize a "right of publicity" that gives individuals (including celebrities) the right to control the commercial exploitation of their name, image, likeness, and persona. Using Johnny Depp's likeness for commercial purposes, even in original AI-generated art, could potentially infringe on his publicity rights, unless the use is somehow transformative enough to be considered protected artistic expression under the First Amendment. This is a complex legal area that is still developing, especially as applied to AI-generated content.

3. False Endorsement: Care should be taken in the marketing of this product to avoid any implication that Johnny Depp has endorsed or is affiliated with the art in any way. Misrepresenting a celebrity's association with a product could lead to additional legal issues.

Given the nuances involved, I would strongly recommend consulting an IP attorney before proceeding with this business idea. They can help you navigate the potential risks and determine what steps may help mitigate legal exposure, such as obtaining licenses, adding clear disclaimers, limiting distribution, etc.

I hope this general information is helpful as a starting point, but please do seek professional legal guidance to fully assess the viability of your plan.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.