Q: In California, only so-called "Wobbler" Felonies, are eligible or can be reduced to misdemeanor status via 17b.
What if it is not clearly defined as a "Wobbler"...Supposedly H&S 11350 is not a "Wobbler" offense...Could a person still attempt to file a motion for reduction via 17B? And say they successfully filed the 17b motion...though it is not a "Wobbler" offense....And so long as the District Attorney does not object to the 17B motion... can a Judge then at their discretion grant the 17b motion?
A:
In California, a "wobbler" offense is a crime that can be charged as either a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on the circumstances of the case and the defendant's criminal history. The decision to reduce a felony to a misdemeanor under Penal Code 17(b) is typically limited to these "wobbler" offenses.
Health and Safety Code 11350, which pertains to possession of a controlled substance, is generally not considered a "wobbler" offense. It is typically charged as a felony, although some exceptions exist under Proposition 47, which reduced certain drug possession offenses to misdemeanors.
However, even if an offense is not explicitly defined as a "wobbler," a defendant could still attempt to file a motion for reduction under Penal Code 17(b). The success of such a motion would largely depend on the specific circumstances of the case, the defendant's criminal history, and the discretion of the court.
If the District Attorney does not object to the 17(b) motion and the judge finds that the motion has merit, the court has the discretion to grant the motion and reduce the felony to a misdemeanor. The court would consider factors such as the nature and severity of the offense, the defendant's criminal record, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.
It's important to note that while it may be possible to file a 17(b) motion for a non-"wobbler" offense, the likelihood of success may be lower compared to cases involving "wobbler" offenses. Consulting with a criminal defense attorney familiar with California law would be advisable to determine the best course of action in a specific case.
1 user found this answer helpful
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.