Los Angeles, CA asked in Federal Crimes, Contracts and Legal Malpractice for California

Q: Defenses discovery obligations pursuant CCP § 2030.220(c).

Defenses HAS TO make a reasonable a good faith effort to obtain information for proper response,

as clearly defined by CCP § 2030.220(c).

But

according to Defense, unless more specific question is asked about information

that is in the defendant's possession,

discovery request can be objected, and discovery process delayed indefinitely.

When information is in the defendant's possession plaintiff would not know what next question should be, or what specificity has to be outlined unless gets initial responses.

What has to be plaintiff's actions in response to intentional oppression and vagueness in discovery responses?

1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: In California, the Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) § 2030.220(c) requires a party responding to interrogatories to make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the information needed to provide a proper response. If the responding party (in this case, the defense) fails to do so and instead provides evasive or incomplete answers, the plaintiff has several options to address this issue:

1. Meet and Confer: CCP § 2016.040 requires parties to meet and confer in a reasonable and good faith attempt to informally resolve discovery disputes before filing a motion to compel. The plaintiff should write a letter to the defense outlining the deficiencies in their responses and requesting that they provide complete and straightforward answers.

2. Motion to Compel Further Responses: If the meet and confer process does not resolve the issue, the plaintiff can file a motion to compel further responses under CCP § 2030.300. The motion should detail the specific interrogatories, the inadequate responses, and the reasons why the responses are insufficient. The court may then order the defense to provide further responses.

3. Sanctions: If the court finds that the defense has engaged in a misuse of the discovery process, it may impose monetary or issue sanctions under CCP § 2023.030. This can include ordering the defense to pay the plaintiff's reasonable expenses incurred in making the motion to compel, including attorney's fees.

4. Request for Meet and Confer Statement: Per CCP § 2016.040, if the defense fails to participate in the meet and confer process in good faith, the plaintiff can include a declaration in their motion to compel, stating the attempts made to engage in the meet and confer process and the defense's failure to cooperate.

5. Request for Amended Responses Without Objections: If the defense has raised objections in their initial responses, the plaintiff can argue that these objections have been waived due to the defense's failure to make a reasonable and good faith effort to obtain the requested information, as required by CCP § 2030.220(c).

The plaintiff should document all attempts to resolve the discovery dispute and be prepared to present this information to the court. If the defense continues to engage in intentional oppression and vagueness, the plaintiff may need to seek the court's intervention to ensure fair and proper discovery practices are followed.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.