Q: Interrogatory/demand correlation is mandatory, or optional upon situation
Is production demand implied to have matching interrogatory?
For example: for proof of affiliation contractual or employment agreement specifically demanded. It does not seem like interrogatory to identify agreement would add clarity in such situation.
A:
In California, interrogatories and requests for production of documents are two separate discovery tools, and they are not necessarily required to match or correlate with each other.
1. Interrogatories: These are written questions that one party sends to another, requiring the responding party to answer under oath. Interrogatories are used to obtain information and facts related to the case.
2. Requests for Production of Documents: These are demands for the opposing party to provide specific documents or tangible evidence relevant to the case.
While it is common for interrogatories and requests for production to cover related topics, they are not required to have a one-to-one correlation. In your example, a request for production of a specific contractual or employment agreement does not necessarily require a corresponding interrogatory to identify the agreement, as the request itself is clear and specific.
However, in some situations, it may be beneficial to have a corresponding interrogatory to provide additional context or clarification. This can help avoid potential objections or disputes over the scope or relevance of the requested documents.
Ultimately, the decision to include a matching interrogatory for a specific document request depends on the specific circumstances of the case and the legal strategy employed by the attorney. It is not mandatory but can be helpful in certain situations to ensure clarity and compliance with the discovery request.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.