Q: Communication, document, or contract in usual course of business. Privileges.
If communication was made NOT in anticipation of lawsuit,
OR
Document was created in ordinary usual course of business;
Can Defendant claim privileges in regards to these artifacts in California Superior Court?
A:
In California, certain communications and documents may be protected by privileges even if they were not created in anticipation of a lawsuit or were created in the ordinary course of business. However, the applicability of privileges depends on the specific type of privilege being claimed and the nature of the communication or document.
Some key privileges that may apply in California Superior Court include:
1. Attorney-client privilege: Communications between an attorney and client for the purpose of seeking or providing legal advice are generally protected, regardless of whether a lawsuit was anticipated at the time of the communication.
2. Work product doctrine: Materials prepared by or for an attorney in the course of legal representation are protected, especially if they were prepared in anticipation of litigation. However, some documents created in the ordinary course of business might not be covered by this privilege.
3. Physician-patient privilege: Communications between a patient and their physician for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment are generally privileged.
4. Marital communications privilege: Private communications between spouses during their marriage are typically privileged.
5. Trade secret privilege: Trade secrets may be protected from disclosure in legal proceedings.
It's important to note that privileges are not absolute and may be subject to exceptions or waiver in certain circumstances. The specific applicability of a privilege will depend on the facts of the case and the nature of the communication or document in question.
If a defendant claims a privilege, they typically must provide a privilege log identifying the withheld documents and the basis for claiming the privilege. The court will then assess the validity of the claimed privilege. If the court finds that the privilege does not apply, it may order the disclosure of the communication or document.
It is advisable to consult with an attorney experienced in handling legal malpractice cases and evidentiary issues in California to determine the applicability of privileges in a specific case.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
