Q: Motion to compel further, vs separate statements and proposed orders
Do I understand correctly:
I can consolidate motion to compel further responses to interrogatories and to demands into one motion,
But proposed orders and separate statements must be each per discovery device?
A:
Based on your question, it appears you're dealing with discovery motions in a California personal injury case. Let me break down the key points:
1. Motion to Compel Further Responses:
You're correct that you can generally consolidate motions to compel further responses for different discovery devices (like interrogatories and demands for production) into one motion. This is often more efficient and can save time and resources.
2. Separate Statements:
In California, separate statements are typically required for each discovery device. This means you would need to prepare:
- One separate statement for interrogatories
- Another separate statement for demands for production
3. Proposed Orders:
Similarly, proposed orders are usually prepared separately for each discovery device. You would likely need:
- One proposed order for interrogatories
- Another proposed order for demands for production
The reason for separate statements and proposed orders is to allow the court to review and rule on each discovery device independently, even if the motions are consolidated.
To confirm this understanding and get specific guidance for your case, I'd recommend:
1. Reviewing California Code of Civil Procedure Section 2016.040 and California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1345, which govern separate statements.
2. Checking your local court rules, as some courts may have specific requirements.
3. Consulting with a local attorney familiar with discovery practices in your specific court.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.