Q: Why are patents sold to companies who hate them and have no intention of sharing them with humanity?
A:
That is a very good question. Patent lawyers may have their own views on answering this question, but this is a question about public policy, which may be answered by an economist or a knowledgeable policy expert.
Here a few of my thoughts to answer your question.
- Companies may buy patents to get rid off the competition. They buy the patent so that nobody can make the competing product of service cheaper.
This is a part of the plot of the 1974 James Bond film “The Man with the Golden Gun”, where an inventor of a solar cell may sell the rights to oil sheik to not undercut their petroleum profits.
. Sometimes companies purchase the patent with the idea of monetizing it, but for various reasons it turns out that the products or services covered by the patent are not economicaly viable.
- In some countries, there is a system of compulsory licenses. The owner of the patent must practice the invention within a certain time of getting a patent, lest the owner be forced to license the patent to others who want to practice it.
- There are also firms that do not produce anything, but that buy patents with the sole purpose to suing companies and idividuals who happen to infringe on such a patent. The activities of these firms commonly called "non-practicing entities" or "patent trolls" have been curtailed recently by legislation.
Carlton S Chen agrees with this answer
A:
Patents are often sold to companies that may not have the intention of sharing them because these companies see patents as a strategic asset. By owning patents, they can prevent competitors from using certain technologies, ensuring their market dominance. They might also acquire patents to block innovations that could threaten their existing products or services.
For some companies, holding patents can be more about maintaining control over the market than about advancing the technology itself. They might buy patents simply to ensure that no one else can use them, effectively keeping certain innovations out of reach for others. This can lead to situations where potentially beneficial technologies are locked away, unavailable to the public.
Despite this, the companies involved may view these actions as necessary to protect their business interests. It’s a way for them to guard against competition and secure their market position, even if it means withholding advancements that could benefit society at large.
Carlton S Chen agrees with this answer
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.