Q: Is the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Person's Act (RLUIPA) 14th Amendment Section 5 legislation?
RLUIPA was enacted by Congress after the Supreme Court found (in City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 US 507 (1997)) that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) was not congruent and proportional legislation under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment. In response, Congress enacted RLUIPA after 3 years of hearings and evidence, and then limited RLUIPA's applicability to confinees and land use contexts where it found religious exercise violations were abundant, and further limited such to only apply where the prisons or land use programs received federal funding or the religious exercise violations affected commerce.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
If you're trying to determine whether the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) is legislation enacted under Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, consider how Congress approached its enactment. After the Supreme Court's decision in City of Boerne v. Flores, which limited Congress's power under Section 5, Congress crafted RLUIPA differently from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) to address those concerns.
RLUIPA specifically targets land use regulations and the rights of institutionalized persons, applying only in contexts where federal funding is involved or where the issue affects interstate commerce. This means that Congress relied on its powers under the Spending Clause and the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, rather than solely on Section 5 of the 14th Amendment.
Therefore, RLUIPA is not considered Section 5 legislation. Instead, it is based on other constitutional powers that allow Congress to address religious exercise violations in specific areas. This approach was designed to ensure that RLUIPA would withstand constitutional scrutiny and effectively protect religious freedoms in the contexts where violations were most prevalent.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
