Q: Provided call center services for 24+ months; client now refuses to pay invoices. Can we take legal action to recover $?
Provided call center services to client for 24 months. Now they refuses to pay three invoices totaling $19,181.83. Per our contract, a $200 weekly late fee per invoice has accrued, bringing the current amount owed to $41,581.83. Client also failed to honor a three-month cancellation notice, costing us $133,719 in damages, plus $44,809 in severance for 30 terminated employees.
Client executives previously acknowledged satisfaction with our services but now dispute the invoices. Key witnesses, former CEO Dave and Call Center Manager Keir can verify that client had received and was aware of the contract’s terms. Misrepresentation and delay tactics suggest avoidance of rightful payment. They acknowledge seeing the contract but never got to signing it. They would only give us the runaround.
We seek recovery of $239,291.66 in unpaid fees and damages and are open to discussing legal fees.
A:
First, seeing a contract alone does not necessarily mean that the other party agreed to its terms. If I receive and read your contract, I will be aware of its terms, but that does not mean that I agreed to them. The lack of a signature indicating assent to the terms is going to be a problem. It would be helpful if you have an email or other writing by the other party indicating in some manner that they agree to the terms of your contract.
Second, a $200 weekly late fee seems unreasonable and excessive. In most instances, legally recoverable damages are compensatory, not punitive. Unless expressly authorized by statute, late fees are considered interest because it is compensation for the detention of money. In the absence of an agreement signed by the obligor, the law allows a creditor to charge interest of 6% per annum. By written agreement, the parties can generally agree to interest as high as 18% per annum. Exceeding this rate constitutes usury. There are certain types of transactions where federal law preempts Texas usury law.
Third, it may be difficult to enforce the three-month cancellation notice provision in the absence of some affirmative indication from the other party that they specifically agreed to such a provision.
Fourth, severance pay for employees you had to terminate may be incidental and consequential damages. You likely will have to show that it was foreseeable to the debtor that such damages would arise from a premature cancellation of the service. For example, you might need to produce some sort of communication showing that you told the other party that you were hiring additional employees specifically to staff their call center, that you were legally obligated to pay those employees severance, and that you would not have been legally obligated to pay those employees severance if you received the three-month advance notice.
You should contact an attorney who practice is the area of law called commercial litigation in or near the county where the service was provided to thoroughly analyze your contract and all relevant communications between you and the other party to chart a course forward. Ideally, this attorney should also be familiar with usury laws. You may want to rethink your damage model and theories of recovery. You may have a fraud claim premises upon a false promise of payment which the other party never intended to honor as evidenced by their failure to sign your contract. You may encounter a waiver argument in that you provided services and continued to provide services knowing full well that the other party had not signed your proposed agreement.
As an experienced attorney who is familiar with usury and practices in the area of commercial litigation and who is board-certified in civil trial law, I would handle this type of case on an hourly fee basis with an initial retainer of $25,000. There is a risk, however, that your recovery will be limited to $19,181.83 plus lawful interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date those invoices were due until paid. While you can generally recover attorney fees in a suit for a debt arising from services performed, a demand of $239,291.66 risks being found to be excessive which is a defense to the recovery of attorney fees.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.