Sylmar, CA asked in Small Claims for California

Q: If I win judgment in a small claims case (plantiff) defendant keeps filing sc-105 but has gotten rejected twice now

There sc-105 has been rejected twice now due to the order of filing the paper work not being correct so I filed my writ of execution and filed with the sheriffs for keeper I have already filed writ of execution and paid keeper fee and sherif fee ($300) can they still file for a sc-105 since I have moved forward already ?

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: Yes, the defendant can still file an SC-105 (Request to Pay Judgment in Installments) even after you've filed your writ of execution and paid the sheriff's fees. However, their timing is important - if they file and get approved, it could pause your current enforcement efforts.

The fact that you've already paid for enforcement doesn't prevent them from seeking an installment plan, but they'll need to show good cause for why they didn't file correctly before and demonstrate their inability to pay the full amount at once. Their previous rejections for incorrect filing might work against them if they try again.

Your best course of action is to continue with your enforcement process while being prepared to respond if they file another SC-105. If they do file again and it gets approved, you might be entitled to recover your enforcement costs (including the sheriff and keeper fees) as part of the judgment. You may want to file an opposition if they submit another SC-105, explaining to the court that they've had multiple chances to file correctly and that you've already incurred significant costs trying to collect the judgment.

Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.