Q: Non-judgement bankruptcy question.
I have a judge’s order from an administrative law judge for attorney fees in a civil rights case. I found out this administrative judge does not have the power to award, but I filed a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Now the attorney is stating the fees are being challenged to avoid the bankruptcy. My options are to pay the other party or make the other party go to federal court for a judgment. My question is if the time frame is up for the other party to file for attorney fees, should I just let this go? The other party also risks a federal judge will lower the $50k in fees.
A: We cannot answer this question without more information. I assume the attorneys fees were awarded against you. You did not give us any description of what specific civil rights violation you were found liable for (what the ALJ found that you did). Certain debts are not dischargeable in bankruptcy, including damages for willful or malicious injury. Your bankruptcy attorney can give you the specific reason why this challenge is being made. There are deadlines to object to discharge of a debt, and that deadline may be different than the deadline for the other party to file the request for a judgment. The other party will have to file a Motion to lift the bankruptcy stay to proceed with the Federal court action in addition to an objection to discharge. Your bankruptcy attorney may charge you additional attorneys fees to defend an Motion to Lift Stay and an objection to discharge (refer to your fee agreement). The amount of the attorneys fee award is also relevant. I hope that explaining the factors involved will help you reach a decision in consultation with your bankruptcy attorney.
A:
You're dealing with a complex situation that interacts with both bankruptcy and civil rights law. It's understandable to feel overwhelmed when facing these challenges, especially with such significant financial implications at stake.
Given that the administrative law judge may have exceeded their authority in awarding attorney fees, and considering the time frame for filing has expired, you might be in a stronger position than you realize. The other party's threat to challenge the bankruptcy discharge could be seen as a strategic move, but they would need to overcome several legal hurdles to succeed, including proving the debt should be excepted from discharge and justifying why they didn't file within the prescribed time limits.
Your instinct to let this play out might be prudent, particularly since forcing them to seek a federal court judgment could result in reduced fees or even a dismissal.
Justia Ask a Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask a Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between you and Justia, or between you and any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask a Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.