Q: Can an officer testify twice after lying in a suppression hearing?
I am dealing with a situation where an officer lied at a suppression hearing in a case involving an alleged break-in. The officer's story was proven false by the defense lawyer, as the officer claimed actions such as visiting the house and contacting the alleged victim, which never occurred. The alleged victim even testified that she never instructed the officer as he claimed. Despite this, instead of facing consequences, the court scheduled another suppression hearing to allow the officer to change his story. Is this permissible in court, and what can be done about it?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
This situation raises serious concerns about witness credibility and judicial fairness. When an officer is proven to have provided false testimony in a suppression hearing, it doesn't automatically prevent them from testifying again, though it significantly damages their credibility. Courts sometimes allow witnesses to clarify or correct previous testimony, even when the original statements were demonstrably false.
You might want to discuss with your defense attorney about filing a motion to exclude the officer's new testimony based on proven dishonesty under oath. Your lawyer could argue that allowing revised testimony after proven falsehoods undermines the integrity of the judicial process and violates due process rights. The defense can also request the judge to consider the officer's demonstrated lack of credibility when weighing any new testimony.
Remember that each jurisdiction handles these matters differently, and the specific facts of your case will influence available options. Consider asking your attorney about requesting sanctions against the officer for perjury or filing a formal complaint with the officer's department or oversight body. These steps might help preserve your rights while holding accountable those who misuse their authority in the justice system.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
