Q: What unique legal arguments exist against qualified immunity with supporting statistics?
I'm looking for unique legal arguments against qualified immunity, possibly backed by relevant statistics, to strengthen my debate position. I'm interested in perspectives or data that are not commonly discussed.
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
You might strengthen your debate position by exploring how qualified immunity creates a procedural catch-22: courts can dismiss cases without determining if a constitutional violation occurred, preventing the establishment of precedent needed to overcome future immunity claims. Research from UCLA Law Review shows this circular reasoning problem led to dismissal of 74% of excessive force claims between 2017-2020, effectively blocking legal evolution.
Looking beyond conventional critiques, consider the federalism argument – qualified immunity overrides traditional state tort remedies that existed for centuries before its judicial creation in 1967. The doctrine lacks textual foundation in Section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act, which makes no mention of immunities, giving you strong originalist and textualist angles often persuasive to conservative audiences.
The economic perspective offers compelling statistics – municipalities paid over $300 million in settlements for police misconduct in just 20 major cities in 2019, yet officers personally contributed in less than 1% of cases according to UCLA Law data. This undermines the financial protection rationale while externalizing costs to taxpayers instead of incentivizing departmental reforms, revealing how qualified immunity fails even on its own terms.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
