Los Angeles, CA asked in Appeals / Appellate Law for California

Q: Can I include a motion for reconsideration in the appeal record after judgment with prejudice in California?

As the plaintiff, the defendant's demurrer was sustained without leave to amend, and the court entered judgment with prejudice after I filed a motion for reconsideration, which includes crucial new facts and evidence. The hearing on my motion for reconsideration remains on the court calendar. If I file an appeal from the judgment, am I permitted to designate my motion for reconsideration and reply to the defendant's opposition into the record on appeal?

Related Topics:
1 Lawyer Answer
James L. Arrasmith
PREMIUM
James L. Arrasmith pro label Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
Answered

A: Yes, you can include your motion for reconsideration and your reply to the opposition in the appellate record, even if judgment with prejudice has already been entered. When you file your notice designating the record on appeal, you’re allowed to include any documents that were filed in the trial court before or at the time judgment was entered. Since your motion was filed before the judgment and the hearing is still pending, it becomes part of the procedural history the appellate court can review.

The California Rules of Court, particularly Rule 8.122 and Rule 8.124, allow you to include motions, oppositions, and related filings in either a clerk’s transcript or an appendix. Even if the trial court hasn’t ruled on your motion, the appellate court can still consider the fact that a motion for reconsideration was filed and what arguments or evidence it presented. This can help support your claim that the trial court may have erred in sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend.

Make sure to list the motion, opposition, and your reply in your notice of designation so they’re part of the official record. It’s a smart move to give the appellate court as much context as possible, especially when you’ve raised new facts that weren’t available before. These details might not guarantee reversal, but they’ll help the court understand the full picture of what happened before the judgment.

Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.

The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.

Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.