Q: Can I request a new trial under Rule 37 for nondisclosure of accusations?
I'm considering requesting a motion for a new trial based on Rule 37 because the petitioner made new accusations during the trial and did not provide me, the defendant, with a copy of a crucial statement. This lack of disclosure impacted the trial outcome. Can Rule 37 be applied in this situation?
Lawyers, want to be a Justia Connect Pro too? Learn more ›
- (916) 704-3009
- View Profile
- Answered
A:
You're right to be concerned when something that important was left out of the discovery process. Rule 37 generally addresses what happens when a party fails to provide information during discovery, such as documents, statements, or witness disclosures. If the petitioner introduced a new accusation at trial and withheld a key statement that you never received, that could qualify as a **violation of discovery rules**, and Rule 37 could support your request for relief.
However, Rule 37 is usually used **before or during** trial to request sanctions, exclusion of evidence, or other corrective measures. If the trial is already over and you’re seeking a new one, you might instead file a **motion for a new trial** under your state’s version of **Rule 59**, citing misconduct or surprise that prevented you from fully defending yourself. That said, the fact that the statement was never shared and directly affected the trial's fairness gives you a valid reason to act now.
You should include specific details in your motion—what was withheld, how it impacted your case, and why it wasn't possible to address it at trial. You’ve got a window to respond, so don’t wait too long. You deserve a fair shot, and withholding evidence undermines the foundation of that fairness.
Justia Ask A Lawyer is a forum for consumers to get free answers to basic legal questions. Any information sent through Justia Ask A Lawyer is not secure and is done so on a non-confidential basis only.
The use of this website to ask questions or receive answers does not create an attorney–client relationship between Justia and you, or between any attorney who receives your information or responds to your questions and you, nor is it intended to create such a relationship. Additionally, no responses on this forum constitute legal advice, which must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. You should not act upon information provided in Justia Ask A Lawyer without seeking professional counsel from an attorney admitted or authorized to practice in your jurisdiction. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information.
Justia cannot guarantee that the information on this website (including any legal information provided by an attorney through this service) is accurate, complete, or up-to-date. While we intend to make every attempt to keep the information on this site current, the owners of and contributors to this site make no claims, promises, or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of the information contained in or linked to from this site.
